Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 July 5

July 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 5, 2011

Trichocereus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Echinopsis#Taxonomy_changes --Taelus (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trichocereus → Trichocereeae (links to redirect • history • stats)

Trichocereus is not the same as Trichocereeae: Trichocereus was a former genus of cactus which was absorbed into genus Echinopsis, while Trichocereeae is a tribe of cactus, a taxonomic rank between family and genus. Canyq (talk) 21:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to Echinopsis#Taxonomy_changes which says that Trichocereus was absorbed to Echinopsis.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
retarget per Lenticel. Thryduulf (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

AOL disk collecting

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AOL disk collectingAOL disk collecting → AOL (links to redirect • history • stats)

Target makes no mention of disk collecting. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, was merged in this edit. —Kusma (t·c) 06:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No one linking this term is seriously going to be interested in AOL as a company. Serves no purpose but to confuse. i kan reed (talk) 19:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It serves the purpose of attributing the edit history and respecting the contributors' copyright. —Kusma (t·c) 20:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I forgot. Sorry, striking vote. i kan reed (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mississauga Red Wolves

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect restored, seems an oddity with Xlinkbot broke it. --Taelus (talk) 11:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects users to an article where there is no mention of the team. Actually, I can find no evidence that Wikipedia knows anything at all about the Mississauga Red Wolves, so there is nowhere to redirect a user to. Chrisrus (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restore target to Ontario Red Wolves, where "Mississauga Red Wolves" is listed as a previous designation. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 04:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment you did not tag the redirect with the RfD template. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 04:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.