Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 November 6

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

November 6

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 6, 2011

United States presidential election redirects

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete all. Ruslik_Zero 18:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk about WP:CRYSTAL, is it really necessary to create such pages that far out -- 17 to 29 years -- in advance? All they do is attract vandals.[1] See also this related RFD discussion back in 2007. Zzyzx11 (talk) 20:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: vandalism is a separate issue, but these pages may accumulate the probably useful information in the future. At the same time, the proposed target article doesn't has no info on these dates and is not the right place to hold such data. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - notable subjects that will merit articles in due course. Redirects of notable topics inhibit article creation and there is nothing related to the precise elections at the target. With respect to the above comment, a redirect will not "accumulate the probably useful information in the future". Better to keep red until there is something worthwhile to say at standalone pages. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all-as above the links will occur in due course, for example, are there any candidates nominated for 2040 yet? All are extreme and violate WP:CRYSTAL Jab843 (talk)
They would have violated WP:CRYSTAL if they were articles. But they are redirects and as such out of the named policy's scope. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Richard A. Batey

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. bibliomaniac15 08:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page for non-notable person redirected to a list where the creator had added the person Mabeenot (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Katharinenkirche, Osnabrück

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. DrKiernan (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Obviously, St. Catherine's Church in Osnabrück is not equal to St. Catherine's Church in Frankfurt.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Michael Ferguson (Convicted murderer)

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 16:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appears from the target article that this man was convicted of manslaughter, not murder (found while tidying dab page at Michael Ferguson) PamD 10:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emmanuel de Bethune

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy closed - now an article so out of scope of RFD. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, target article doesn't even mention Bethune. Mewulwe (talk) 09:40, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Logical processor

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:RED. Ruslik_Zero 18:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, the term logical processor has nothing to do with how it is implemented (Hyper-threading is one way one can get more than the actual physical core count) Jasper Deng (talk) 03:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_6&oldid=1083556210"