Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 December 21

December 21

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 21, 2013.

Head hair

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, without prejudice to writing an article at this title. Thryduulf (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Head hairHead hair → Hair (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Suggest deletion: Previously it redirect to hair#head hair which no longer exists. Also no section specifically about head hair exits on en:wiki. Redirecting to 'hair' will not give the visitor a satisfying answer when s/he is specifically looking for head hair. Also, I could not find info about head hair on the English Wikipedia. Other languages do have an article on head hair, so it seems a 'forgotten' subject. A red link will motivate Wikipedians to write about it. Timelezz (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. At least with this redirect, if someone looks for Head hair they will find an article which covers human head hair (among other types of hair), and which includes links to other related topics such as Human hair color and Hairstyle. That seems more useful than giving them no article at all. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I'd say delete if I could really picture a separate article on head hair, but right now I can't. I don't think this is a very useful redirect, but neither can I see much of a benefit in deletion. --BDD (talk) 18:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Entertainment Culture, Hospitality Recreation, Health Medical Pharma, Technology Internet, Social Issues, Religion Belief, Disaster Accident

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 December 31#Entertainment Culture, Hospitality Recreations, Health Medical Pharma, Technology Internet, Social Issues, Religion Belief, Disaster Accident

Redemptore

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redemptore → Contractor (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Target is a disambiguation page for which it is doubtful that this title matches all meanings. Delete or find a specific article to target this to. bd2412 T 02:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

delete Googling for this mostly gets a huge spray of hits on Latin phrases of all sorts, leaving no clue as to how this has anything to do with any kind of contracting. There's no obvious single Latin target. Mangoe (talk) 16:20, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010 in birding and ornithology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2010 in birding and ornithology → Birdwatching (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Deletion; since it should actually be a list of Birding events for the year 2010 & not an article on Birdwatching. Refer 2009 in birding and ornithology & 2011 in birding and ornithology - Ninney (talk) 19:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFD#DELETE point 10. This would then be red in the template whereas now it conceals the fact that there is no article. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The Whispering Wind ! Its good if the link 2010 in birding and ornithology is in Red in articles, templates, categories ... almost everywhere. Atleast some user who is interested in ornithology would then try to create a listing for the year 2010 & our purpose would be solved. Even the year 2013 does not exist, check 2013 in birding and ornithology & so 2014 in birding and ornithology as of now. - Ninney (talk) 10:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems like an excellent use of redlink to encourage creation. Wily D 08:47, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly ! Thanks Wily D - Ninney (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.