Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 15

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

March 15

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 15, 2019.

File:Polyiamond cartoon.png

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent creation , practically unused ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 02:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't think the full stop is necessary or helpful for this or any other redirect that is a complete sentence. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Changed my mind; the redirect is apparently from a page move, and could thus potentially be useful. Geolodus (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All international sports events held in São Paulo

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Section does not exist, and target article would not include "All" if it did exist. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Omicron Delta Kappa logo.png

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, recent creation, file was renamed to avoid a naming conflict with other media. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:KOF94gameplay.png

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created, Not in use in mainspace. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ann Shea

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 23#Ann Shea

Rigani

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 23#Rigani

Wikipedia:WPBT

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Effectively Unused meaningless shortcut clutter Legacypac (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Romantic (architecture)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. We haven't Romantic architecture, and the mentions in the article are all about Gothic architecture. Perhaps WP:REDLINK, perhaps redirect to Gothic. We have Category:National Romantic style architecture, and obviously "Romantic architecture" is a common name, but nothing quite hits the nail on the thumb. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not sure what the problem is. "Romantic" is the adjective for the form of architecture known as "Romanticism" (see e.g. Curl). Bermicourt (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, the mentions in the target are all for Gothic architecture and Gothic Revival architecture. If that is synonymous with Romantic architecture we should say so: but there is no good wrongfooting people looking for Romantic architecture to find the only content is about Gothic architecture. i.e. WP:RFD#D2. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Given that this term is used for widely divergent styles, this is, at best, an ambiguity. If a term has no single meaning, a single redirect is a very bad thing. Qwirkle (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 07:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bassena

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article and relist at AfD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally a short article describing a Viennese residence of a type often known in English as a bedsit. It isn't an English word, it's German. Someone then redirected this title to Bedsit. But, first, WP:NOTDICTIONARY, which includes this not being a translation dictionary. Second, as a redirect, WP:FORRED applies. Third, the translation is wrong anyway. A bassena isn't a living space, it's a community spigot shared in such a space by residents without in-unit drinking water. See de:Bassena. Largoplazo (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 07:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Tavix: RfD is not the place to determine whether an article should be kept or deleted, if you think it is just a dicdef and that deleting is better than improving then that is an argument you should be making at AfD after restoration. AfD is where those editors who are experienced in judging things like this, and where those who are good at and interested in expanding such articles where that is possible will see it and give it a fair hearing. Thryduulf (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, I don't like wasting time with additional discussions if I feel it unnecessary, which I do here. It's been a redirect for a decade and a half, and an article for about a week, so it's fair to treat it as a redirect in this instance. -- Tavix (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • I do not share your view that such a discussion would be unnecessary or a waste of time. RfD is not the the place to evaluate content that does not meet the speedy deletion criteria because it is not set up to evaluate content any more than AfD is a correct venue to discuss redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ohio Star

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 23#Ohio Star

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_15&oldid=1301659367"