Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

July 8

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 8, 2022.

Abe government

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Abe Cabinet. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could this not also refer to the government of Abraham Lincoln? TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Number

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Number (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is more than one number. TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. One day, disk space permitting, we may have a list of them all. Until then, we could create a dab listing The Number (book) and The Number (film). Certes (talk) 21:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Historic Mount Vernon

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would someone add the word "historic" in front of this? TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The First Dog

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#The First Dog

Paris Hilton's Dog

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why someone would search this? TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Hilton is known for her love of small dogs, so it seems like a reasonable search term, even if the capitalisation is a bit off. Certes (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:Ganeshk/sandbox/CSVTest/banana

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. WP:CSK#1 and WP:CSK#3: No (accurate) reason was provided to delete this userspace redirect. Was called "vandalism" by the nominator, but it doesn't seem to be vandalism, leaving no rationales remaining. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like it was vandalism, but was then redirected to Banana by another user. Pretty harmless, but maybe it should be deleted? TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well J947 summed it up well. Honestly? its in a sysop's userspace (and a sandbox subpage at that) and if he really cared that much, they'd have dealt with it years ago. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 05:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Apfelbäume

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 16#Apfelbäume

Calle Ocho

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Calle Ocho (8th St in Miami) is not really part of the Tamiami Trail, it was already there when the highway was built. And the terms is mostly associated with Miami's large Cuban-American community. A better target would probably be Little Havana or Calle Ocho Festival Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Street redirects generally should describe the road it's a part of, and it became a part of Tamiami Trail when it was built. I see no issue with the redirect as-is as mention of Little Havana is already in the lede, and I can easily add the festival in there. Nate • (chatter) 00:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 8th Street is part of US 41 in which Tamiami Trail is the section between Tampa and Miami. The lede of the article notes your exact concern:

It becomes Southwest 8th Street in Miami-Dade County, famous as Calle Ocho in the Little Havana section of Miami (and site of the eponymous annual festival), before ending east of Miami Avenue as Southeast 8th Street at Brickell Avenue in Brickell, Downtown Miami.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by The Grid (talk • contribs) 17:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Complex algebra

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Complex algebra

93 FM

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Two separate disambiguation pages are to be created: 93 FM over the original redirect and 93.0 FM on its own. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of 93.0 FMs, so I don't see the point of linking specifically to this station. Iseult Δx parlez moi 09:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Setindexify with the draft below the redirect per my comment below. What becomes of Draft:93.0 FM and 93.0 FM is a separate question. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • The draft underneath at 93 FM and the draft at DRAFT:93.0 FM are two different topics. "93 FM" is a page listing radio stations advertising as 93 on the FM dial, while "93.0 FM" is for radio stations that actually occupy 93.0MHz. There are many stations that do not reside at exactly 93.0MHz but which advertise that they are 93 on the dial, and for which, you can usually have reception at 93 on the dial. (such as 92.9 or 93.1). An entry at 93 FM for 93.0 FM would interlink the two. -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 02:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The two very different disambiguation page drafts need to be reconciled somehow.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

      • Comment there is no need to reconcile the two different SIA pages. They can exist as they are and all that is needed is to interlink the two pages, with a see also to each other. The two different SIA pages represent two different topics, one "radio stations representing themselves as 93 on the FM dial" existing at 93 FM (which do not necessarily broadcast at 93.0MHz, but also broadcast at similar frequencies, such as 92.9MHz and 93.1MHz), and the second "FM radio stations broadcasting at 93.0MHz" which exists at DRAFT: 93.0 FM . -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 02:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see, you want set indexes at both 93 FM and 93.0 FM. So Draft:93.0 FM is really a separate issue, and a lot of confusion was created by the one IP creating both a draft in response to another IP's comment and then drafting a separate set index to replace the redirect. I have revised my comment above. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That said, there is the existing precedent of 95 FM and 97 FM simply being redirects to 95.0 FM and 97.0 FM, respectively, rather than being separate SIAs. Going forward, all of these should be treated analogously. If we end up with a setindex at 93 FM, we should strive to create SIAs over the other analogous redirects. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Old Apple

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, similar rationale as in the discussion of New Apple, below. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2022−23 ACF Fiorentina season

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#2022−23 ACF Fiorentina season

Nelly

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Wrong venue. Please refer to WP:RM for requesting page moves, or to WP:AFC/R for requesting redirects. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 11:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ukrainian Separatist War

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not used so much. In any case current redirect to a page War in Donbas is inappropriate. Ukrainian Civil War as a target would make more sense, but I prefer removal. BlackBony (talk) 07:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

💃🏻

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Nominator admitted their rationale was mistaken and requested early closure. Only vote here is a keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It says on the redirect page (which uses Template:R from emoji): "Do not use it for multiple-character emoji sequences, such as skin tone variants or national flags". AKK700 06:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blackmerican

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a term that is used, as far as I can tell. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cisgender sexuality

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Cisgender sexuality

Chi-Beria

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Early 2014 North American cold wave#Record temperatures. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to refer to some sort of vortex? TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:36, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yamagato Fellowship

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what this means? TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heavies

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This could refer to anything that is heavy. Not unambiguous. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

'67

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 67. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could also refer to 2067, 1867, 1767, etc. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shōwa 41

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Shōwa 41

P0rn

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would someone type this with a zero? TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Stats suggest it is used. Alternate spellings of profane words are common on the internet, as attempts to evade filters. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this is a common spelling. -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per ab0ve. In additi0n t0 this particular spelling's use t0 evade filters, the 0 key is just ab0ve the O 0ne. S0me0ne might type in a 0 by accidents. Regards, S0NIC678 15:28, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Common self-censoring term. Nate • (chatter) 21:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Pr0nPr0n redirects to Leet#Pr0n. P0rnP0rn isn't mentioned there but may be considered a variant. Would someone typing P0rn be seeking the w0rd or the genre? (I naively assume that they seek material of a type available on Wikipedia.) Certes (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep a common and cheeky way of avoiding profanity filters --Lenticel (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pornog

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not a likely abbreviation. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mr. Gates

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gates (surname). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the only notable "Mr. Gates". TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eating children

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Child cannibalism. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surely this can't only refer to this? TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Китай

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Китай

2009 attempted defection of 5 Virginians

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#2009 attempted defection of 5 Virginians

Honey pig

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is Welsh for bear, but it doesn't seem likely that someone would search this. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New Apple

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this means, but it doesn't seem like a plausible search term. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The fox Street Journal

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this? TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gamestop Corp Class A

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to refer to a specific class of stock shares for Gamestop; every public corporation has classes of shares, but we don't need additional redirects for these. Maybe it's appropriate for Gamestop, because of the past history relating to it's stock, but I'm not sure. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Actually very few companies have more than one class of shares, and this specific class is mentioned both in the infobox and the template at the bottom of the article. Previous RfD discussion has kept other companies' share class redirects when the infobox condition is met. 15,800 Google results for this exact phrase suggest it is a plausible search term. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per United Happy Editing--IAmChaos 05:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🫠

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Symbols and Pictographs Extended-A. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 08:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My computer can't even render this one, but based on the other alchemical redirects created by this editor (see below), I imagine that it is likely an alchemical sign. Delete unless evidence can be found that this sign unambiguously refers to melting. signed, Rosguill talk 18:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill According to a google search this emoji is a "melting face". 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the correction, I see it here as well. I guess it's relatively unambiguous, but it still doesn't seem particularly useful to readers and would lean towards deletion, redirecting to Emoji, or redirecting to a unicode block. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree that deletion is probably the best outcome per WP:REMOJI. "someone's face melting" is not an actual encyclopaedic topic and it's rather ambiguous, the current target isn't really a good fit, I imagine most people would use it to refer to warm weather, hyperthermia or something similar. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The emoji is a melting face emoji so Melting seems like a good target. If a better one is proposed, please ping me. Regardless of target, emoji redirects should never be deleted. Worst case, redirect to Emoji or to the specific block. Gonnym (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't follow the reasoning for never be deleted. I've seen several editors assert this, but it's not clear to me why this should be the case. signed, Rosguill talk 23:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 02:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WP:INVOLVED relist for closing the June 24th log page, and for possibly gaining some input on the late retargeting suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_July_8&oldid=1113240784"