Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 3

< February 2

February 4 >

February 3

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 3, 2023.

Garfield Bound for Home

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11#Garfield Bound for Home

Wives of Chris Warner

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Chris Warner#Relationships. (non-admin closure) ^Clyde!_Franklin! 20:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wives of Chris WarnerWives of Chris Warner → Chris Warner  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect. ★Trekker (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine to Chris Warner#Relationships, which is about Chris Warner's wives. Duckmather (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine Target to Chris Warner#Relationships per Duckmather --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine Target to Chris Warner#Relationships per Duckmather - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rcie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:56, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Rcie → Rice  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect should be deleted because it is a typo, not a misspelling (cf. Finalnd). Mast303 (talk) 05:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak disambiguate per WP:XY and redirect to RCIE, as an ambiguous term. MusiBedrock (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: The page "RCIE" does not exist, so Rcie should be deleted. Mast303 (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, as an uncommon misspelling. I honestly don't understand what MusiBedrock seems to be proposing above. Disambiguating a misspelling is rarely a good idea, and retargeting to RCIE wouldn't work because it doesn't exist. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Cyclone. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as "rice" is a four-letter word, and simple word typos will be more known. And we don't want to waste people's time by having to fix their search term by swapping out the letters. WPchanger2011 (talk) 22:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WPchanger2011: Please see the RFD discussion for Finalnd. It says that intentional misspellings make good redirects, but typos do not. Mast303 (talk) 01:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete per WP:REDLINK I see the point as a plausible misspelling but my Google Searches show that organizations with the RCIE acronym seems to be the likely targets. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The redirect Rcie may meet one or more criteria for speedy deletion, including R3. 18:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Mast303 (talk) 18:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply: simple word typos are more common and are more likely to be noticable. So it could be a plausible typo. WPchanger2011 (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does not meet R3, it was not recently created. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete We can't waste time and space on every single misspelling of common words, a normal person is able to realize that they've spelled it wrong and search for the correct word next time.★Trekker (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above - typo does not make good redirect. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | edits) 14:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Microsoft Internet Exploder

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12#Microsoft Internet Exploder

Israeli immigration to South Florida

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Israeli Americans#Demographics. Delete Israeli immigration to South Florida Jay 💬 19:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Israeli immigration to South Florida → Immigration to the United States#Contemporary immigration  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Israeli immigration to New YorkIsraeli immigration to New York → Immigration to the United States#Contemporary immigration  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Israeli immigration to Los AngelesIsraeli immigration to Los Angeles → Immigration to the United States#Contemporary immigration  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect target has no information at all about the subject (South Florida isn't even mentioned, and while Los Angeles is mentioned, it is not in relation to Israel). Sending readers to articles which contain no info on the topic is not helpful. Fram (talk) 09:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Realistically it seems like Israeli immigration to the United StatesIsraeli immigration to the United States should be made into an article instead of just a redirect; however, as that article is currently a redirect to the same section which does not mention anything about the redirects. TartarTorte 14:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget all to Israeli Americans which is the most specific article covering this topic. Israeli immigration to the United StatesIsraeli immigration to the United States should also be retargeted there as well. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget all to Israeli Americans per Presidentman. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 10:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I was not notified for 2 of these as required by WP:RFDHOWTO.
• Comment There are several appropriate targets. It may be best to retarget to the suggestion above. I don't know. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget Israeli immigration to New York and Israeli immigration to Los Angeles to Israeli Americans or specifically Israeli Americans#Demographics. Delete Israeli immigration to South Florida. There is no discussion whatsoever of Israeli immigration to South Florida at the current target or the above suggested target. While Florida and South Florida are mentioned, this is not referring to immigration from Israel, but rather the table gives the number of people of Israeli decent living in Florida (not specifically South Florida, and from the year 2000), and there is also a mention of South Florida having Hebrew language newspapers. A7V2 (talk) 07:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the South Florida redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Israeli immigration to New York and Israeli immigration to Los Angeles to Israeli Americans#Demographics, and delete Israeli immigration to South Florida. I echo A7V2's thoughts exactly. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Melinto Leutronio

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Melinto Leutronio → Thomas Aquinas  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at the target. I have no idea what this is supposed to refer to. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• delete seems to be one of his pseudonym per Lexicon pseudonymorum. However, unless justified with a better source, I think this is an obscure synonym/ pseudonym. --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Landing platform vessel

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 19#Landing platform vessel

Baylor University Press

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 10#Baylor University Press

Wikipedia:CLIMATE

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 10#Wikipedia:CLIMATE

Christian terrorism in India

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Christian terrorism in India → Christian terrorism#India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target section Christian terrorism#India doesn't exist and hasn't existed for years. The Discoverer (talk) 04:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete India isn’t even mentioned in the target article making the redirect unless.--70.24.249.205 (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Johnny Sewald

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 05:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Johnny Sewald → Paul Sewald#Personal life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think it necessarily meets any of the WP:RDEL criteria but I can't see a reason for this redirect to exist. This is a professional baseball player who was not a highly regarded prospect and only played three seasons of minor league baseball. I would say he faded into obscurity after that but he never rose out of it in the first place. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).