Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

January 8

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 8, 2025.

Manop Leeprasansakul

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Article restored and now at AfD (non-admin closure) --Paul_012 (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Target article only includes medallists, does not include this person. LibStar (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

50 Ways

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It could refer to other topics such as 50 Ways to Say Goodbye, 50 Ways of Saying Fabulous, and 50 Ways to Leave Your Lover (film). Frost 22:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alan Johnson (Peep Show

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Missing closing parenthesis Utopes (talk / cont) 20:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Invention of powder

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

to my knowledge, "powder" could refer to at least one other thing. seems to have originally been created as homework, and was blar'd with an edit summary that... didn't make much sense, if i'm being honest consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; horrendously ambiguous. The edit summary probably refers to the fact that the article gunpowder is a more complete and detailed article. Ca talk to me! 22:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Star Wars Episode VII: A New Dawn

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 20:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created in 2013, when eager Star Wars fans believed that the copyright for the then-forthcoming Star Wars Rebels novel "A New Dawn" could have been Episode VII's eventual name. Aside from it being an inaccurate fan theory, it was never a common name or used in any official capacity. As this concerns what is now an old movie, I recommend this redirect be deleted. BOTTO (T•C) 20:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

seems to refer to a surname or brand. only seen in authors' names in the target consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

3A Apparels Droptima

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

a... brand? droptima is mentioned in the target as a method of washing jeans (though not defined beyond that), but 3a isn't consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Potoroini

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawn and integrated into the taxobox system. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (u — c) 21:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not mentioned in the target. results seem torn between it being a related term in some language (possibly to any member of the potoroidae family), a tpyo, or in the absolute worst case scenario, a pun (though on what, i can't tell) consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It's a legitimate taxonomic tribe per [2]. However, it includes more than just the genus Potorous (which redirects to Potoroo. Delete or keep doesn't matter... I'll have time later today to write a stub to replace it. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Upgrading my comment to keep - UtherSRG (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I created this redirect; this tribe name is from the Mammal Diversity Database and seems to be a near-synonym for the genus Potorous. Also, why go through this procedure instead of my talk page to verify this? --Ellicrum (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
it's probably worth a mention, then, though i am admittedly a little iffy on putting it there if it only seems to be a near-synonym. gonna have to do some looking in a while consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 12:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In older classification schemes, it was definitely not synonymous. Now, however, all of the other genera have been moved out to other tribes or out of tribes altogether. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
if there's a mention now, i guess it can be withdrawn without much issue consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 11:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ukrainian Voice

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a textbook case of a redirect that does not make any sense whatsoever. Anonymous 20:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created this three years ago. I have no idea why now! I presume I did have a reason. Happy for it to be removed. Bondegezou (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bondegezou based on the history, it was a redirect to a DAB page with the same name and slightly different capitalization. The DAB page was deleted and this orphaned redirect ended up being retargeted to a vaguely relevant destination. So although it no longer makes sense, it did have a function when you created it. Anonymous 21:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert bad bot edit and speedy delete as G8, a redirect to the deleted page Ukrainian voice. The double-redirect bots have been broken in this respect for decades; it's just that no one's bothered to fix them. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Red Movement

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 18#Red Movement

Turb

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 07:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (though I'm unsure if that's the correct course of action). It first redirected to Future-Drama since Turb is a fictional drug very briefly mentioned once in that episode of The Simpsons. Subsequently redirected to Hot dog in what I am assuming is an act of vandalism. Its past Simpsons-related usage is barely significant. It's a made-up term used once in a throw-away line and never mentioned again. "turb" has some other minor usages (a person called (Toomas Turb, acronym for trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor, shortened form of turbulence) so I'm not entirely sure what to do with this redirect (delete? disambig? put it back to redirect to Future-Drama as it originally did? re-target?) TheZoodles (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pentapotamian people

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 00:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems unlikely someone would use an ancient greek derived name for a group of people, especially when said group did not have an independent identity at that time. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pentapotamia redirects to Punjab. I added those redirects by analogy. I'm also not fully sure if that term is actually "Ancient Greek", rather than a modern calque. Pescavelho (talk) 16:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources in Punjab do mention that the ancient Greeks called it that. Pentapotamia as a redirect is fine, as it refers to the region. Punjabi as an actual independent identity evolved more than a millennia after that. So these redirects do not make sense. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR. Gotitbro (talk) 03:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified the target pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Peanutgate

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was refine to the Allegations and investigations section. Jay 💬 00:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, making the connection between the target and the redirect unclear. In addition, third party search engines seem to associate this phrase with Peanut the squirrel for some reason, but the redirect isn't mentioned in that article either. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'd assume it refers to the handling of Jimmy Carter's peanut farm while it was placed in a blind trust, but couldn't tell you for sure. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:36, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Refine to § Allegations and investigations, with a hatnote to Peanut the squirrel . The terms seems to be used by the media to refer to the investigations on Jimmy Carter's peanut farm. [3][4]
However, it is also used to describe the Peanut the squirrel incident. [5][6] Ca talk to me! 07:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If this is suppose to refer to the handling of Jimmy Carter's peanut farm during his presidency, the redirect needs to redirect to the corresponding section in the article dealing with the subject, and one would think actually mention the term peanutgate if ever referred to as. Onikaburgers (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My proposal does exactly that. Ca talk to me! 00:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bloodhouse

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20#Bloodhouse

Gulf of America

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16#Gulf of America

Human shields in Gaza

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Human shields in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Jay 💬 15:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect, as the IDF also uses human shields in Gaza. Human shields in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is a more appropriate target. मल्ल (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per nom. Anonymous 20:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brian Wood (British Army solider)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in the disambiguator. Redirect targets the correct spelling. At a related RfD closed today, Brian Wood (solider) and Michael Gibson (British Army solider) were deleted. The close said that there was consensus to delete cases where the misspelling is in the disambiguator. Jay 💬 09:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Argufy

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. SilverLocust 💬 22:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 18#Argufying. Paul_012 (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do it. CheeseyHead (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should also delete Argufied. CheeseyHead (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
clumped it here, and tagged them both for g7 for good measure consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tik tok

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Paul_012 (talk) 11:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re-target to Tik Tok (song), the rationale is simply that, in a paper encyclopedia, If you search for Tik Tok in index it goes to Tik Tok, otherwise I would search for TikTok at the alphabetic order 'tikt'. I know the search isn't properly an index, but since there's not a paractical index, it should work as too. gtp (talk) 07:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably there is a previous RFD entry which I didn't find out at a first attempt gtp (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Regressus Diaholi

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Phrase meaning "return of the devil". Not mentioned in topic; primary topic according to a quick search is probably the Laid in Ashes song of that name for which we don't have a page (or even one for the band). Rusalkii (talk) 06:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Return of satan

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very vague term with many possible topics of which this is not the primary one; also incorrect capitalization. Rusalkii (talk) 06:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete per the first half of the nom's reasoning, but the capitalization thing is fine. or retarget to antonblast, whichever is funnier consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 12:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sentro Rival

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely mispelling - I'm not getting any hits for this at all. Rusalkii (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matt Brill

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable retired minor league player. Chew(V • T • E) 05:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete due to lack of mention combined with the unlikelihood that the mere existence of the redirect itself provides the information the searcher would be looking for, nor would it be a navigational aid to the target (which would be the only two reasons to keep a redirect without a mention to my understanding). Fieari (talk) 06:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Apache shirt

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 19#Apache shirt

Tungsten Arm O'Doyle

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21#Tungsten Arm O'Doyle

Spectral genetic analysis

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"spectral" not mentioned anywhere in target. The exact phrase "spectral genetic analysis" seems rarely used; all hits but one are for something from the fictional show SuperFriends. Rusalkii (talk) 05:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Recently created with no explanation in the edit summary. No hits that produce a coherent connection to genetic analysis on DDG or Google when tacking on "-Superfriends". Cruft-y easter egg? It's possible this is meant to refer to the variety techniques that leverage fluorescence or absorbance to sequence DNA, but that is a stretch. ― Synpath 14:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kanye West's unrealized projects

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was convert to article (thanks to RTSthestardust and others) and move to List of unreleased projects by Kanye West. Jay 💬 15:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target; this wording not used anywhere on the internet I can find. More a search term than a title. Rusalkii (talk) 05:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. None of the lists linked in the disamb page Kanye West discography contain any section dedicated to unrealized projects and many of his unreleased songs are not mentioned in any place in Wikipedia. An list like the lists in Category:Lists of unrealized projects by artist could be created. Ca talk to me! 12:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've created a rough draft at Draft:Kanye West's unrealized projects. मल्ल (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this improves the situation at hand. The wording of the redirect is an issue altogether. – The Grid (talk) 14:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. "Kanye West's unrealized projects" almost certainly constitute an encyclopedic topic, and once the draft is mainspace-ready I think a descriptive title like that will be appropriate for them. However, while the draft is still under construction, not much is gained by having the title redirect to the main Kanye West article. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to keep as the new mainspace article is a plausible destination. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 20:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article has finally been finished and is now published as an article. I've worked on it in my sandbox. RTSthestardust (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The draft article seems finished and brings encyclopedic value. Onikaburgers (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I made a redirect to List of unreleased projects by Kanye West. Articles with "X unrealized projects" seem more for film directors. – The Grid (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wirtland (micronation)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have recorded the authorship at the talk page per Wikipedia:Merge and delete#Record authorship and delete history. -- Tavix (talk) 01:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After it was merged, the entry was deleted for not meeting List of micronations's criteria for inclusion (non-notable / no article). Currently there is no mention of Wirtland anywhere on the article. x RozuRozu • teacups 04:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 05:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: History needs to be kept somewhere due to attribution requirements. Even if the content has been removed from the current version, it's still in the page history of the target. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Player1

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template has been moved to {{Handball player}}, and all former usages have been moved to use their correct template. MikeVitale 04:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moche (Portuguese mobile)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15#Moche (Portuguese mobile)

Encounter Dinosaurs

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fairview Portals. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 07:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the target does not discuss the Encounter Dinosaurs app, I believe users would be disappointed by this redirect. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The inter-Trump era

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 04:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick Google search, I haven't found any sources using this terminology. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made that redirect in case if someone wants to look up Biden years. As the Biden's presidency was between Trump's two terms. I thought the redirects made sense to an extent. Rager7 (talk) 00:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xiaoxin desktop

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 04:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Xiaoxin" is not mentioned at the target. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PLL-01

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15#PLL-01

Ponting Engineering Bureau

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15#Ponting Engineering Bureau

Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw, Los Angeles

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore and send to AfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Crenshaw, Los Angeles exists, this redirect feels like an WP:XY situation. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Doreen Welsh

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. All have now been mentioned in the article (non-admin closure). (non-admin closure) Rusalkii (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, though they occur in other places like National_Air_and_Space_Museum_Trophy#Recipients_for_Current_Achievement and Sully_Sullenberger#Post-flight_accolades_and_publicity. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_January_8&oldid=1270798596"