Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2021 September 27

Entertainment desk
< September 26	<< Aug | September | Oct >>	September 28 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

September 27

Missing backstory in Anton: A Young Boy, His Friend and the Russian Revolution

I watched Anton (2019 film), Zaza Urushadze's last film, based on Canadian Dale Eisler's book Anton: A Young Boy, His Friend and the Russian Revolution. In one of the last scenes, the Catholic priest Fridrikh faces Trotsky and reminds him of the time when they first met. I have no idea what they were talking about and I blamed the film copy I was watching, but in this review (www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-anton-thats-what-friends-are-for):

has the personal vendetta against Trotsky, but unless I missed it, audiences will never know why.

so I am not the only one. Strangely, the credits have "Georgii Vechkanov ... Fridrikh in youth" and this image (www.themoviedb.org/t/p/w533_and_h300_bestv2/lgJvRHsPKxxaKYy1u8KPtkjujh8.jpg) that I don't remember seeing in the film features a bespectacled character that could be a young Trotsky. So my question is: What is the grudge between Fridrikh and Trotsky? Does it appear in the novel? Was it shot and later cut from edition? Why? I thought it could be because the director died after the film, but it seems that he managed to watch his film finished. --Error (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It could be interesting to find out how many editors here have seen films that, on Wikipedia, are only redlinks. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having read the novel is probably enough.--Error (talk) 21:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the novel is likewise redlinked. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 22:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Film adaptation. The film audience will never know up to 90% of the content of the original novel. Some of it will be implied but there will inevitably be plot holes and backstory events that must be left to the viewer's imagination.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 08:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still, the fact that a separate actor portrays young Fridrikh means the film has an – apparently inconspicuous – scene that may explain the allusion.  --Lambiam 20:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]