Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2025 July 16
Science desk | ||
---|---|---|
< July 15 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
July 16
editIdentify insect, possibly Popillia japonica
editThe title of the photo c:File:Coleottero giapponese o Scarabeo giapponese in accoppiamento.jpg says Popillia japonica. Location according to uploader is c:Category:Parco del Curone, Lombardy, Italy. This puts me in a stalemate where I don't dare to categorize it into c:category:Popillia japonica because I'm not certain the title is correct, but don't dare to tag it c:Category:Unidentified insects either because the identification is right there in title. Please help resolve this either way (or categorize to a taxon larger than species but smaller than class) if you're more familiar with insect identification than me. – b_jonas 08:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see a problem. The article Popillia japonica states it's an invasive species in Europe - "In 2014, the first population in mainland Europe was discovered near Milan, Italy." 196.50.199.218 (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Totally a Japanese beetle. Abductive (reasoning) 09:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Definitely. They've been common in my neck of the woods (North Carolina) as far back as I can remember. Just because a ___location is referenced by the scientific name doesn't mean that the species is only found in that ___location. It may even have been extirpated in the nominal ___location. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 12:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the replies, I'll add the category. "Japanese" wasn't what bothered me. It's just that since it's a common species, the uploader who needn't be an expert could misidentify a different insect species as this. – b_jonas 12:59, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Definitely. They've been common in my neck of the woods (North Carolina) as far back as I can remember. Just because a ___location is referenced by the scientific name doesn't mean that the species is only found in that ___location. It may even have been extirpated in the nominal ___location. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 12:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Totally a Japanese beetle. Abductive (reasoning) 09:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm confused: are these kingdoms one and same or are they different? Wikipedia is rather unclear about it, because the phylum Deinococcota is included in both.
Thank you 212.195.74.177 (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Some of the difficulties with bacterial taxonomy are given in that article. Abductive (reasoning) 12:09, 17 July 2025 (UTC)