Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crownofworms

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/5/1); ended 17:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

crownofworms (talk · contribs) - A good fellow, with a heart of fire.. Crownofworms 20:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closing early as per WP:SNOW. The candidate requires more experience in all areas of Wikipedia before another RfA can be considered. (aeropagitica) 16:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: blocking and tagging, many other things....

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: the ozzy osbourne article. I move some things around and re-wrote somethings to make the article make more sense. Before, it had trivia sections right in the middle of the biography and it ruined the flow. I also worked on the bobaflex article and many others.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:i've gotten along with everyone so far. all you have to do is be polite to everyone and remember the guidlines of wikipedia.

• See crownofworms's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for crownofworms: Crownofworms (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/USERNAME before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose. This is too early. It may be better to withdraw. SilkTork 14:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose I agree with Silk. This nomination is too early. And, the answers to the questions are relatively short. My suggestion would be to you is to get involved with WikiProjects, WP:AFDs, write articles, etc. Miranda 14:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose, sorry, and strongly recommend self-withdrawal before imminent WP:SNOW closure. Your enthusiasm is welcome, but far more experience is needed in all areas. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship.--Húsönd 14:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose there's about a dozen things wrong with this. Way too new, your first edit is asking about adminship, the RfA is very poorly thought out. I recommend you stick around quite awhile longer before you consider running for adminship --L-- 15:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5. Oppose 57 edits, new account, and poor answers to questions are the 3 reasons I oppose. Sorry. SLSB talk • contrib 15:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

1. You really don't have enough of a track record for me to make a serious evaluation of you. Editors with less than 50 edits never pass. I suggest you withdraw.--Chaser - T 13:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.