Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ESCStudent774441

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final, (0/10/0); Ended 04:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC) by SynergeticMaggot

(0/10/0); Scheduled to end 02:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

ESCStudent774441 (talk · contribs) - I am wishing to be more effective by seeking this post. ESCStudent774441 (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A:Anti-vandalism work and grammatical editing of articles relating to New York State government.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Minor editing of articles on political figures of New York State, my home state.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

Yes, not too long ago. How I will deal with them is to seek the aid of other more experienced admininstrators in difficult cases. I'd like to be mentored by an experienced admin.

• See ESCStudent774441's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for ESCStudent774441: ESCStudent774441 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/ESCStudent774441 before commenting.

• Recommedn withdrawal or a WP:SNOW closure. Tiptoety ^talk 03:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose, lack of experience. Only 6 mainspace edits. Wizardman 03:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2. Thank you for wanting to serve the community, it is greatly appreciated. But with only 168 edits and a little over 1 month of editing you have not demonstrated a clear understanding of wikipedia policies. Gain more admin related experience in areas such as WP:AFD, WP:ANI, WP:UAA, WP:AIV, and read up on WP:ADMIN. Best of luck, Tiptoety ^talk 03:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose. I see that you intend to be a productive editor, and I applaud your enthusiasm, but I don't think you quite have the experience I generally look for in a successful candidate. You indicate that you would like to be mentored by an experienced admin, and that would be a great first step - perhaps, once you've edited in a productive manner for a few months, admin coaching would be in order. Best wishes, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 03:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose – I would ask that you come back in 6 months. With less than 30 days involvement with the project, you only have your little toe wet, lets see if you still want the extra buttons after you are dunked a few times. Best of luck to you. ShoesssS ^Talk 03:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
5. Oppose as neither enough time nor edits, make a thousand edits, half to the mainspace and come back when you have been here 3 months. Also you do not need admin tools to make minor grammatical corrections and arguably its not necessary for anti-vandalism work either. Thanks, SqueakBox 03:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
6. Oppose Per lack of experience and this comment that indicates past behavior issues [1]. MBisanz ^talk 03:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
7. Oppose Come back in 6 months. You need experience in making mainspace edits, dealing with conflict, wikipedia policy etc. Thanks. Five Years 03:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
8. Oppose - Experience. Suggest a close per WP:SNOW. Try WP:ADMINCOACH and WP:ER. Cheers! Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 03:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
9. Oppose Roughly no experience with editing the encyclopedia, let alone admin-related areas. Enigma ^message Review 03:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
10. Opppose - at least six months. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.