Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Halil marx07

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

FINAL: (0/9/0} Closed at 19:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC) by Courcelles per WP:NOTNOW.

Halil marx07 (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Halil marx07 (talk) 17:48, 03 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept the nomination

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I want to edit and block unnecessary editors and vandalism.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: The Tukuran, Zamboanga del Sur and Pagadian City article bacause its indicate all the history, geography and politics of the place.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Yes, but I did is to undo it if it is not fair.

• Links for Halil marx07: Halil marx07 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Halil marx07 can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

1. WP:NOTNOW Vodello (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2. Obvious WP:NOTNOW case, I recommend you withdraw this as it will probably be closed soon anyway. Throw in WP:NOTMYSPACE as another reason for my oppose. You have barely 600 edits, and over 150 of those are to your own userpage. And your answers to the standard questions indicate a poor understanding of the English language. Communication is an essential skill for an admin, you need to be able to talk to other users coherently. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3. WP:NOTNOW Sorry while I welcome your desire to contribute to Wikipedia Please try again later good luck.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4. WP:NOTNOW - The fact that this RfA hasn't been set up properly basically sums it up. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5. Per WP:NOTNOW and Beeblebrox. There is no nom and very weak answers to questions. ~NerdyScienceDude 18:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6. Any crats around....WP:NOTNOWTofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 19:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7. Sorry, I'm going to have to oppose for the same reasons as all previous voters. The Utahraptor's sock (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
8. Oppose per above - please close asap, thanks. Jusdafax 19:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
9. Oppose. Concerns with experience, policy knowledge, and judgement. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.