 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that epic pwned. Please eat the candidate.
Contents
Final: (Graham's Number/x3/4.3 Googels). Closed by Willy on Wheels at 00:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
editJI Hawkins (talk · contribs) – I believe his user will be a great candidate for adminship because of his extreme hard work working on articles by adding information about Sanders conspiracies. Hofbrincl Hhlbbcnofm (talk) 02:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination. My first target will be... JI Hawkins (talk) 02:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
editDear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: Creating socks to help fix the wiki from All those Harmful Editors.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I was lucky enough not to have any conflicts in the past, but when one rises, I'll just ban the other party.
- 4. Would you care to explain your addiction to spice and Perri-Air? —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 03:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A: I have an addiction?
General comments
edit- Links for JI Hawkins: JI Hawkins (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for JI Hawkins can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/JI Hawkins before commenting.
Discussion
editRfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
- This would be pretty funny except that the user who created this is a SPA, and probably a sock of Hawkins. Can someone look into this? Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait, how is this different than my deleted nomination? I admit mine was in poor taste but how is my nomination of someone blocked for abuse different than the nomination of someone blocked for sockpuppetry? Remember it's AFD not AfD)Valley2city‽ 04:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support
edit
- Strong Support. No chance user will misuse the tools in their current state. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 02:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongest possible Support for answer to question 3. CTJF83 chat 04:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support As long as you give me some of that chicken that's been washed in the Fountain of youth. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 04:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Kenrick Talk 05:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong opposeas obvious sock of banned user. Wait, Strong support for excellent imitation of banned user. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Support on wheels! Leftis (atkl) 19:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support So he wants to block Jimbo and ClueBot. We'll see how this goes. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 22:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support If he gets the bit, this ought to be good <grabs popcorn>. — BQZip01 — talk 22:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
edit- You remind me of Stephen Hawkings. BejinhanTalk 03:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not enough llama related edits. User:Llamas-on-Wheels!!!
- Doesn't respond to ANYONE! How can we trust someone who is unable to talk to anybody! Other than that, seems like a fine candidate...
- Strong oppose - user has too sick a sense of humour.
- Thou shalt not possess a sick sense of humour, stupid. —A N Other, What the heck's an RfA? Kayau Voting IS evil 00:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongest possible oppose The candidate, or someone like him, posted a comment on some talk page about 5-6 years ago... or I think it was a talk page... anyway, it had a faint trace of sarcasm in it, and it really rubbed me the wrong way. I think sarcasm has no place on the Internet, and no one who displays such blatant Incivility should be allowed to log into the Internet and post sarcastic message... or someone who looks like them... because such offensive messages offend me deeply... 5 or 6 years ago... or was it 7? Anyway, it really rubbed me the wrong way and I'm outraged. Did I say Oppose yet? Where's my hat? Is this the door out?... Dekkappai (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- lolwut. -FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete
edit- Speedy delete per WP:APRIL. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- per 10 # Dlohcierekim 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.