Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pattav2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Voice your opinion Closed per Wikipedia:Not now at 06:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC) by User:Aervanath

Pattav2 (talk · contribs) - Pattav2 is a user who enjoys editing wikipedia. He had made some great contributions to Formula 1 articles and Telecom Australia.Pattav2 (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: Im intend to take part in making sure that the F1 articles are in good shape and that unreferenced matrial is fixed up.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contribution was adding detail to the Telecom Australia article.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:I have in the past but I didnt take a big deal out of it because when the explained to me that I was wrong there was no point fighting over it.

• Links for Pattav2: Pattav2 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Pattav2 before commenting.

1. Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. Less than 200 edits (only 6 in the last two months), no experience in admin related areas. I find the answers to the questions fairly vague and insubstantial, and not being able to tranclude your RfA isn't a good sign either. Ironholds (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose also NOTNOW. I despise EDITCOUNTITIS, but just not enough experience, sorry, and no meaningful experience in projectspace. [ roux ] [x] 06:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Neutral Hi! I applaud your enthusiasm, but This will probably get close per WP:NOTNOW. Take a look at this for other things to do to help out. Sorry, and good luck in the future! CWii_(BOO!|Eeek!) 06:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.