Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Strennman

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

talk page (0/6/0); Scheduled to end 19:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Closed per Not Yet by Enigma ^message 21:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strennman (talk · contribs) - I think that I will be a good admin. I will ban vandals and stop them from editing. I have not been in any problems at wikipedia. Strennman (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Yes, I nominate myself Strennman

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: Anything that requires an admin to do

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: IDK, I haven't done much yet, but I will

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No and I will not insult others

• See Strennman's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Strennman: Strennman (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Strennman before commenting.

1. Way too soon. 5 edits, including 3 for this RFA. --Kbdank71 20:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose - low edit count, neglected to read self-nom instructions. reccomend snow/towel/notyet closure. For what it's worth, your two contributions prior to preparing this RFA were spot-on. Keep it up! xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 20:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose I view self-nominations with only two contributions to Wikipedia as prima facie evidence that this RFA will trigger a WP:SNOW. Keepscases (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
4. FAIL -- Gurchzilla (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
5. Ignore the above comment, you haven't failed, but unfortunately you just aren't ready yet to become an admin. Consider reading this essay which explains why, and also some advice here. Thanks, EJF (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
6. Strong oppose per EJF. Happy editing. Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk? 20:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.