Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tsepelcory

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final: (0/4/0) closed at 14:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW by non-crat \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk}.

Tsepelcory (talk · contribs) – I have made over 50 edits since July 10, 2009.I first came to Meta on July 7 Tsepelcory (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A:

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

• Links for Tsepelcory: Tsepelcory (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Tsepelcory can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Tsepelcory before commenting.

1. Oppose You look like you want to do good, but I'd like to see more experience. 73 edits just isn't enough to be able to make a judgment one way or the other, or even a detailed oppose rationale. So I'm afraid I can't really teach you much, but if you want to know how to be a good administrator you can ask other administrators for help. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 13:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. Please come back when you have at least several thousand contributions. In addition, please consider using the edit summary with all of your edits. Cheers, tedder (talk) 13:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. You need a lot more experience I'm afraid. Keep working, and after you've been here for about 6 months and have gotten a feel for it, and a higher edit count, please re-apply. You look to be a very promising editor. ceranthor 13:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Strong oppose per my suspicions of sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phuntsok2000. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)^{help us!} 13:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.