Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wikisteph888

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final: (0/9/0); Closed at 16:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Request for adminship closed in accordance with WP:SNOW. Acalamari 16:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisteph888 (talk · contribs) - I am a great user who helps out. I'm cool. Thats about it. Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Wikisteph888 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 15:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept!

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I plan to fight vandalism.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My mainspace edits.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No.

• See Wikisteph888's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Wikisteph888: Wikisteph888 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

---

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Wikisteph888 before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. Your account is too new and you have too few contributions to evaluate you as an editor. Contribute to the encyclopedia for a few months and then try again. I urge you to withdraw this RfA. Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 15:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose - signature contains an unclosed bold tag. There's also the issue of doing only one mainspace edit (and that was unconstructive), no edits to Wikipedia space (other than this RFA and an editor review), and no proof that you've actually fought vandalism yet. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 15:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose - too new and unfamiliar with policy. Recent userpage contributions lets me know that this user is not mature for adminship. Miranda 15:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose Vandalized. Tsk Tsk. RuneWiki⁷⁷⁷ 15:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5. Oppose [1] ~ Wikihermit 15:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6. Oppose Spend some time working on articles and actually fighting some vandalism. Although the saying is "Quality, not quantity", I'm afraid you have neither right now. Good luck in the future! DanThaMan17 16:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7. Oppose - Try again when you have more maturity and experience - and work on that edit count. Roadmr (t|c) 16:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8. Oppose as too new. Try again in four to six months, after a 1000 edits, and please use edit summaries. I am eager to support RfAs for qualified candidates. Bearian 16:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9. Oppose, placed false barnstars on her pages. T Rex | talk 16:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.