Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/readeww

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

(0/3/0); Scheduled to end 13:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn per WP:SNOW. GlassCobra 15:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

readeww (talk · contribs) - Request for Adminship Readeww (talk) 13:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I'd like to take part in abuse on wikipedia. In the school system a few years back, our entire school system was blocked on wikipedia because of abuse, and i'd like to make a positive improvement, and make a difference. Working for them, I believe this is possible.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contributions on wikipedia thus far are on editing articles for minor details, as I notice small errors. In the education world, wikipedia is not respected, and often not allowed as a source for anything. I'd like to help be an advocate to prove wikiedia to the world.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:I have not been in any conflicts over editing. I will deal with it by calm discussion. Any one person can be incorrect. I have to accept the fact that it might be me.

• See readeww's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for readeww: Readeww (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/readeww before commenting.

Support. 155.104.37.17 (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose. So, you have registred your accont in 2006, but You haven't edited any article! Well, you need more work in Wikipedia, or either, you must know what mean the world "Wikipedia" to launch your RfA; Sorry. --Cold Phoenix _T/C\M 14:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose - This should be closed per WP:SNOW - you are HIGHLY UNLIKELY to get even 1 support vote since you have less than 10 edits to your credit, and half of those are trying to create your own Rfa. Come back when you have a couple thousand edits under your belt. ArcAngel (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose - Need more experience, thanks for your interest in serving the community though! Tiptoety ^talk 15:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose - I SNOWed the last one - someone else field this. Thanks for your interest in helping the community though. Edit hard and come back. Cheers. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.