Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker/Proposed decision

all proposed

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

• Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
• Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
• Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if she/he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, no arbitrators are recused and 6 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop.

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Wikipedia is not a battleground

1) Repeated disruption of Wikipedia due to editwarring and quarrelling is a violation of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

Leyasu on revert parole

1) By remedy in a prior arbitration case Leyasu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is on revert parole, Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Leyasu#...on_Leyasu.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Leyasu unable to conform to revert parole

2) Leyasu is unable to conform to the revert parole imposed on him and having exhausted the 5 block limit is now subject to blocks of up to one year Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Leyasu#Enforcement_of_parole.2FProbation. He is currently blocked for three months Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Leyasu#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Deathrocker has history of blocks

3) Deathrocker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has an extensive history of blocks for quarreling and revert warring, often in a context where he is quarreling with Leyasu.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Edit warring by Deathrocker

4) Deathrocker has engaged in extensive edit warring in the same genre of articles frequented by Leyasus such as Gothic Music Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Deathrocker#Gothic_Music_and_Nu_Metal_.28Banned_By_Admin_Sceptre.29.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Deathrocker placed on revert parole

1) Deathrocker is placed on revert parole. If he reverts any article more than once per 24 hour period or more than 2 times in any 7 day period or more than 3 times in any 30 day period he may be briefly blocked. Blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Deathrocker#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Leyasu revert parole modified

2) Leyasu's revert parole is modified. If he reverts any article more than once per 24 hour period or more than 2 times in any 7 day period or more than 3 times in any 30 day period he may be blocked for up to a year. Blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Leyasu#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

Enforcement by block Deathrocker

1) Should Deathrocker, using any user account or ip, violate his revert parole he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year. Blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Deathrocker#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Enforcement by block Leyasu

2) Should Leyasu, using any user account or ip, violate his revert parole he may be blocked for up to a year. Blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Deathrocker#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Dmcdevit·t 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. James F. (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. ➥the Epopt 21:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

General

Motion to close

Implementation notes

Clerks and arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

• Everything passes 6-0

Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

1. Close. Dmcdevit·t 04:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Close. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. Close ➥the Epopt 13:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]