Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne/Workshop

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Motions and requests by the parties

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

No Original Resarch

No Original Research is an official policy of Wikipedia.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Civility

Wikipedia editors are expected to be civil. Civility is necessary for the development of consensus that supports the development of an encyclopedia.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Original Research

The ArbCom finds that Licorne has engaged in original research.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

• I think this needs to be reformulated. Doing original research by itself is not a problem, it only becomes a problem when one tries to get it into Wikipedia. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• "has engaged in original research and attempted to use Wikipedia to publish the results"? I think that's what a violation of WP:NOR amounts to; the original version might be a shorthand for that. --Alvestrand 10:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incivility

The ArbCom finds that Licorne has been uncivil.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Contempt for Dispute Resolution

The ArbCom finds that Licorne has showed contempt for the dispute resolution process.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

One-Year Ban

Licorne is banned from Wikipedia for one year for original research, disruption, and disregard of the community and its processes.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Probation

Licorne is placed on Wikipedia:Probation indefinitely. Any admin may ban him from any article that he disrupts.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: