Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mlorrey/Proposed decision

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

• Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
• Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
• Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, 2 Arbitrators are recused (2 auto-recusals by Jayjg and Fennec) and 3 are inactive (Mav, Theresa, Nohat), so 4 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page.

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Advocacy

1) Wikipedia is not a forum for advocacy of a political cause, see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 16:35 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Legal dispute

2) Any user involved in a legal dispute with Wikipedia or another Wikipedia user may be banned until the dispute is resolved or settled.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 20:05 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Advocacy by Mlorrey

1) Mlorrey (talk · contribs) strongly advocates the Right to bear arms, to the extent of equating support of gun control with Nazism and fascism [1] and Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mlorrey#Response

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 16:24 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Other involved editors

Meelar

2.1) Meelar (talk · contribs) has worked on articles such as Gun politics in the United States and corrected Mlorrey (talk · contribs)'s POV edits [2] , see Talk:Gun politics in the United States.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 19:34 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Firebug

2.2) Firebug (talk · contribs)

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 20:01 (UTC)

Oppose:

1. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC) - this FOF doesn't actually state anything

Abstain:

1. I'd like to see this point explained a little better before I vote ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
2. Me too. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilawyering by Mlorrey

3) Based on the Hague Service Convention, Mlorrey (talk · contribs) has issued a restraining order against Meelor and Firebug, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mlorrey#Temporary_Injunction.2FRestraining_Order_invoked_against_Meelar.2FFirebug.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 20:01 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Partial editing ban

1) Mlorrey (talk · contribs) is banned from articles and talk pages which relate to gun control for one year.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 20:09 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Editing ban

1) Mlorrey (talk · contribs) is banned from Wikipedia pending resolution of his legal dispute with users Meelar and Firebug.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 20:09 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:18 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Short bans

1) If Mlorrey (talk · contribs) edits articles or talk pages which relate to gun control during his partial editing ban, he may be banned for a brief period by an administrator, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder June 28, 2005 20:19 (UTC)
2. ➥the Epopt 21:41, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
3. →Raul654 19:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
4. James F. (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

General

Motion to close

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

1. Everything's passed. →Raul654 21:41, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
2. Close Fred Bauder 21:51, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
3. Close. James F. (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
4. Close ➥the Epopt 22:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]