Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Adrianzax
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 13:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Adrianzax (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Iulian28ti (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: E
- Supporting evidence: Both users edit the articles Romanians and Romany people and have the same opinions, the same aggressive style of attacking the other editors arguing they "can't accept the truth". They both had the peculiar style of reverting using the same edit summary as the one used by the last editor. (see reverts 3 and 4) During the last two weeks, Adrianzax has been temporarily blocked twice for revert-warring and now he reverted just three times, after which Iulian28ti continued to revert another three times, in order to avoid 3RR.
Reverts:
- revert 1 (Adrianzax) - 10:02
- revert 2 (Adrianzax) - 12:06
- revert 3 (Adrianzax) - 12:14
- revert 4 (Iulian28ti) - 15:48
- revert 5 (Iulian28ti) - 15:54
- revert 6 (Iulian28ti) - 16:08
bogdan (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Likely (but not definite, there are technical scenarios in which these are not the same user) Block on behaviour if warranted, I agree the reverts are strongly suggestive of correlation or at least working together. ++Lar: t/c 05:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- PS, remember, 3RR is a bright line, not an entitlement. This particular behaviour by either one is blockable in my view, given warnings, even if the other were completely not present. ++Lar: t/c 05:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.