Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Argol136

If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Argol136}}
The previous request (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Argol136

edit

Almost certainly a sock puppet of User:Argol136 - a banned user, and a sleeper account set up to circumvent indefinate blocks and a semi-protection placed on Shaw and Crompton. Account set up very recently and instantly doing the same erroneous/vandalous edit pattern for which he's been blocked for before for going against the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) (see Shaw and Crompton edit history for confirmation). Jhamez84 13:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


 Clerk note: Praesepe913 has been indef blocked by Kilo-Lima (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as a suspected sockpuppet. Thatcher131 20:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-opened for additional request

Both have made similar edits to Shaw and Crompton. Please check to see if they are related. King of 22:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, the User:Filmfan1971 is trying to cover up the sock puppet tag with his own IP address (see the user page history).
Additionally, for a really comprehensive list of his accounts, quotes, behaviour and IPs, I've took it upon myself to document his entire history at User_talk:Jhamez84/The_Lancastrian_Vandal - excessive you may think, but I'm the one he's targetted! I'm hoping to present this evidence to the relevant "Long Term Vandalism" page soon for a long-overdue Range Block. Thanks guys, Jhamez 23:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.