Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bentheadvocate

< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | Case
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bentheadvocate}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Bentheadvocate

edit
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 16:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm not seeing specific disruption on the mentioned article. Here's a diff of all his edits. I note there not been much/any reversion done and his edits have all be just two sessions.[1] Magnonimous' edits[2] seem to be very different - Alison ❤ 17:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And the account timing, the obvious linguistic tics - the no overlapping edits, and the median edit times? PouponOnToast (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, provide the evidence please and remember that fish CheckUser is not for fishing. Also, I note that there are no overlapping edits because Bentheadvocate began editing six weeks after Magnonimous and socks had stopped. Have you thought about opening a SSP case first? - Alison ❤ 18:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By six weeks you mean 22 hours after the ban on Magnonimous was entered? [3] [4]. It's ok - I mean, I didn't find the time to put a tracking cookie in an email to him and then start a million threads around the internet, so he can just go right on harassing people. PouponOnToast (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gratuitous WordBomb reference aside, I was referring to the last edits being six week before - Alison ❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Deferred another checkuser for second opinion re. case - Alison ❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alison, are you asking for a second opinion on whether to run the check or on the results? Thatcher 16:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Emailing ... - Alison ❤ 17:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unnecessary}} - dropping my request PouponOnToast (talk) 09:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Bentheadvocate&oldid=1140417453"