Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hagiographer

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hagiographer}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Hagiographer

• Hagiographer (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• BlackApe (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

BlackApe's username and first edit are arguably racist, and likely refers to User:SquealingPig, an attack account allegedly created by User:Zapatancas to attack SqeakBox. His second edit redirects Roberto Weiss to User:SqueakBox; Weiss is SqueakBox's grandfather and a frequent target of Zapatancas/Hagiographer/Squeakbox conflict. If checkuser establishes a connection, can one of the clerks drop a week-long block on Hagiographer per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas#Log of blocks and bans. Thanks. Thatcher131 22:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Possible, but slightly unlikely. Mackensen (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hmm. What about Zapatancas (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), or is he too old? Also look at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zapatancas. Even though Zapatancas and Hagiographer edit from different ISPs, Hagiographer's behavior toward Squeakbox led the community to endorse Tony Sidaway's proposal to extend Zapatancas' probation to Hagiographer. If he's not the same person, its an odd coincidence of editing interests. If he is the same person, and has found a way to avoid technical confirmation, that kind of scuttles the arbitration remedies on his side. Thanks either way. Thatcher131 12:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • If there are reasons to suspect apart from technical evidence, then I'd say it's pretty unlikely we're dealing with two different people. Mackensen (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.