Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MAJ5

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MAJ5}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

MAJ5

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 23:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

MAJ5 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Code letter: G

MAJ5 is an account that has been registered for less than a week. his contribs show a lot of edits to things that new users do not know about, like username vio reporting (his first two edits), AIV reports, and other things. He even adopted a user (who later removed himself from the adoption), which requires that one be an experienced editor. The catalyst was this: on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SlimXero he voted keep (after having started a similar MfD for ShooterBoy), with IMHO, a poor vote rationale. I commented that the user was new (>100 edits, and only one article space edit at the time), whereupon said user took offense and has posted comments on a few user's talkpages User:DodgerOfZion and User:Fred.e, and on the latter alleging that I "wanted him (MAJ5) to go because he was new". Now, what MAJ5 is participating in is not new user stuff, and I think he's trying to distract people from him in order to hide the fact that he is either a puppeteer or a sock. MSJapan 23:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Nothing worth noting found on the IP, if it is an alternate account, then thats fine, since people can have several accounts as long as there is no abuse/vote stacking. Voice-of-All 23:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bugman94 for sock proof. MSJapan 20:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.