Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Srkris
Srkris
edit- Srkris (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- BCEF:
User:Srkris, blocked for one week for violations of WP:COPY, WP:SPAM, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, etc has returned and has been editing anonymously. Parthi talk/contribs 20:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
This user using these ips has been editing and reverting the same articles User:Srkris used to edit. He is also leaving fake warning messages in other users talk pages: [1], [2]. This is in clear violation of the one week block handed down for consistent violation of a number of policies. - Parthi talk/contribs 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I endorse this request as the admin who performed the user block. DurovaCharge! 02:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Declined. Mackensen (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: It is not clear why this request was declined. If it is due to lack of diffs, here are some which clearly shows that this user identifies with the blocked editor:
- [3] - acceptance that he is User:Srkris and is breaking the block
- 59.92.83.63 [4] - incivility
- 59.92.83.63 [5] - reverting copyvio notices and questioning the validity of WP guidelines. WP:COI
- [6] - incivlity
- 59.92.87.43 [7] - incivility and acceptance that he is user:Srkris
- 59.92.87.43 [8] - acceptance that he is user:Srkris
- [9] - Personal attacks
- 59.92.46.252 [10] - disputing blatent copyvio and questioning the validity of WP guidelines.
- 59.92.46.252 [11] - reverting copyvio notices
- 59.92.46.252 [12] - Incivility
- 59.92.46.252 [13] - reverting blatent copyvio notice
- 59.92.46.252 [14] - WP:COI violations and the acceptance that he is User:Srkris
- 59.92.46.252 [15] - reverting copyvio notice
- [16] - Personal attacks and vandalising my User page
- 59.92.63.37 [17] - Fake warnings in my talk page
- 59.92.63.37 [18] - acceptance that he is User:Srkris
- [19] - Incivility and acceptance that he is User:Srkris
- [20], [21], [22],[23] - 3RR violations using anon edits
- Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 22:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Declined. Absent a serious policy violation we cannot "out" IP addresses. Mackensen (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:COPY, WP:COI, WP:3RR, WP:Vandal, etc cited above are not policy violations? Parthi talk/contribs 01:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- You've overlooked "serious." Mackensen (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Am I to understand that avoidance of blocks by editing anonymously is not a serious breach of policy? Can you also please direct me to the policy which clearly defines the circumstances for a valid checkuser? thanks Parthi talk/contribs 02:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- You've overlooked "serious." Mackensen (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:COPY, WP:COI, WP:3RR, WP:Vandal, etc cited above are not policy violations? Parthi talk/contribs 01:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Clerk assistance requested: This request has been denied, and will be staying that way. Please archive this before it escalates any further. Those interested can find the Board-approved checkuser policy at m:Checkuser policy. Essjay (Talk) 05:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.