Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adw.x.hs

Adw.x.hs

Adw.x.hs (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

30 May 2025

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

AetherLens (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

All related to the constant attempts to create a page for the upcoming film War 2 (see this thread on the talk page of Explicit (also pinging Arjayay who is familiar). These two accounts are the most recent with one moving to mainspace under yet another disambiguation as the title (and several other disambiguation) is protected. I am assuming there are sleepers as well with the amount of SPAs on the half dozen drafts and previous mainspace moves. CNMall41 (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking closer, there are likely more user who are promoting Yash Films (see this history).--CNMall41 (talk) 18:06, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Asilvering:, thanks for the ping and wish I could give you something more. I would start with Theriazz123 but I stopped compiling evidence due to backlash I received going after SOCKS and UPE (partly my fault). Bowed out of these SPIs about a month ago. If anyone wants to go down the rabbit hole, this is all related to Yash Raj Films and promotion of the company and related films. If not, I am sure that those involved will wind up in another SPI eventually (they always do). --CNMall41 (talk) 04:09, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Possible. PhilKnight (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
CNMall41, is there anyone in particular from that page history you think ought to be checked? If so, can you provide some specific evidence? I had a quick look through the already blocked accounts, but none are (related) sockfarms. -- asilvering (talk) 23:19, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing without action. I think AetherLens is pretty sus but that's all I've got. asilvering (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]