Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dobbs1996/Archive

Dobbs1996

Dobbs1996 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

02 September 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

TadghDubhaigh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Notaculchie (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

SPA with the same edit style on Fingal. Checkuser might be stale on master but Tadgh and Notaculchie both active today. Diffs [1] from Tadgh and then redone by Notaculchie [2] (as a direct undo). Original edit from Dobbs [3]. Murry1975 (talk) 22:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also 188.141.57.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - same 'discussion' through edit summaries. RashersTierney (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

A screaming duck. Pity, I have a certain sympathy with their POV, but edit-warring and socking is a dead-end street. RashersTierney (talk) 19:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk endorsed - There is ample evidence to suggest that these accounts are linked, based on the warrior methods used in editing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - Your ducks are a lined up for blocks, therefore I have blocked them. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 18:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]