Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frantzedward.cha/Archive


Frantzedward.cha

02 July 2011
edit
Suspected sockpuppets


Same disruptive edits, same interests ([1]). Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit

21 July 2011
edit
Suspected sockpuppets


This seems clear to me under WP:DUCK, but I would rather have a second set of eyes review this. The user has the same interests, edits the same articles, and has been uploading the same copyrighted content as the prior two socks (see File:EENEBPS.jpg).

Also, the timeline of the creation of each user account is clearly linear, with the next one picking up shortly after the prior one is blocked ...
 • Frantzedward.cha was blocked May 22, 2011.
 • On May 28th, user June1998 began editing, and was blocked on June 29th when found to be a sock of Frantzedward.cha (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambifan101 - June1998 was originally reported there, and while they were found to be a sockpuppet, they are not a sock of Bambifan101).
 • On July 3rd, user CartoonNetworkFan100 began editing the same set of articles.

For now I'm holding off on blocking the latest sock myself, pending the SPI review. - Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I was not aware of the prior SPI until after I submitted the new one. From the archive, user:FrantzEd was also editing July 1 and July 2, fitting in between the active times of June1998 and CartoonNetworkFan100. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users
edit

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit