Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VoiceEncoder/Archive

VoiceEncoder

VoiceEncoder (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

22 January 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

AnalogVocoder1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

VoiceEncoder was blocked as a spam account. AnalogVocoder1 is adding links to the same material, and has the same uncivil style of editing, calling other editors "ass" ([1],[2],[3],[4]), just as VoiceEncoder did. The prior contributions may be too old/stale for Checkuser, but on behavioural grounds, this one is an obvious WP:DUCK situation, in my opinion. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Check declined by a checkuser The old account is Stale but CU isn't necessary - this one is quacking loudly. WilliamH (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note Yeah, that's pretty obvious. Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

Gamilo7 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Exact same pattern of edits as before on Cylon (1978), Vocoder, and Trans (album), citing original research to dubious reference. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

It's Possible the two are related. Behavior will be a better indicator here. TN X Man 03:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, i'd say its the same. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]