- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sock puppeteer
Boxx Faxx (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Suspected sock puppets
- Nine Hole (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 68.30.196.196 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 70.8.94.37 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 68.30.163.239 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
68.30.14.29 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Report submission by
-- JediLofty UserTalk 12:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grambling "GT All Business" Dominique, Jr. use of multiple accounts to !vote repeatedly
- Comments
I've just added 70.8.94.37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) per this edit. It's either the same as 68.130 or just another "helpful" spellchecker. TravellingCari 13:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- and 68.30.163.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) probably is 68.30.163.239 but in case it's just related. I don't understand how IP addresses change with use, but yeah, lots of SPAs in someone who may not exist. TravellingCari 01:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- and 68.30.14.29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), also spell checking others' comments. AfD is a mess. I've already suggested that Boxx Faxx get a block from this independent of socking after re-creating this following a final warning. TravellingCari 03:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
- All the IP addresses resolve to the same ISP, leading me to believe that this is in either one house, or one company. Either way, this is obvious sockage/meatage, and as such, blocking them. Soxπed93(blag) 20:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]