- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Tom Sayle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
79.73.93.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
79.74.63.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
79.74.0.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
JGHowes talk - 21:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
Block-evading sock using anon IPs to add false information to bios of living persons, such as John Walker (organist) in last 48 hours. By his own edit on my talk page, he has linked his blocked username to IP79.74.63.15 and the warnings left on those anon IP talk pages. See this diff. Likewise, by his edit at User talk:Wafulz, he has linked IP79.73.93.44 to his blocked account, see this diff.
- Comments
These dynamic DSL IPs all resolve back to Tiscali UK Ltd, origin AS9105.
Contribs from this range follow the same edit pattern, disrupting the same articles, etc., and are being used only for disruptive edits from blocked user Tom Sayle, who has "promised" to create alternate accounts, he says. A range block should be considered.
- Conclusions
Over 262K users would be blocked to cover all three IPs. I've semiprot'd the page instead. Tagged users. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]