- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sock puppeteer
Tom Sayle (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Suspected sock puppets
- Mr. SvMvP (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- [ roux ] [x] 18:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
- Same MO; same age; welcoming self on talk page; shows a far greater knowledge of WP than would be expected from a brand-new account from a 13-year-old kid.
- Comments
- Please remember to notify all accounts listed as possibly linked to the sock puppetry in question (instructions).
- Evidence needs to be a tad stronger than that. If the two ages were exactly the same, then I'd be suspicious. Any proof that Tom Sayle's age is the same? Diff? ScarianCall me Pat! 18:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- here Tombomp (talk/contribs) 18:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The age and MO (whatever it is) is co-incidental that they're the same, the amount of experience I have is from editing WP using lots of IPs outside of this account.--Mr. SvMvP (talk) 18:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I do not have aspergers syndrome, as is indicated on Mathematiquizard's page.--Mr. SvMvP (talk) 18:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The age and MO (whatever it is) is co-incidental that they're the same, the amount of experience I have is from editing WP using lots of IPs outside of this account.--Mr. SvMvP (talk) 18:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- here Tombomp (talk/contribs) 18:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be noted that 'no it's someone else' is what he always says, and always in the same way [1] (see unblock requests). [ roux ] [x] 18:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thats for unblocking, not for aspergers syndrome. Also if I was, User:Mr. Templatedtalkpagediter would be as well.--Mr. SvMvP (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ding ding ding. He always says his other socks should also be blocked. [ roux ] [x] 18:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thats for unblocking, not for aspergers syndrome. Also if I was, User:Mr. Templatedtalkpagediter would be as well.--Mr. SvMvP (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be noted that 'no it's someone else' is what he always says, and always in the same way [1] (see unblock requests). [ roux ] [x] 18:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- So, wait, is Mr. SvMvP User:Mathematiquizard or not? Because that'd be quite the coincidence in age, to be honest. Btw, SvMvP, see modus operandi for a definition of MO. ScarianCall me Pat! 18:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is, yes. Also User:Disliker of humanities, User:Mr. Templatedtalkpagediter apparently, etc etc. [ roux ] [x] 18:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... I would recommend a WP:RfCU. Unless more evidence can be provided I would not feel confident blocking just based on the age, and the apparent experience amassed as an anonymous editor. Drop a note at CU and tell them that I recommended it. ScarianCall me Pat! 18:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. [ roux ] [x] 19:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... I would recommend a WP:RfCU. Unless more evidence can be provided I would not feel confident blocking just based on the age, and the apparent experience amassed as an anonymous editor. Drop a note at CU and tell them that I recommended it. ScarianCall me Pat! 18:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is, yes. Also User:Disliker of humanities, User:Mr. Templatedtalkpagediter apparently, etc etc. [ roux ] [x] 18:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions