Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 March 20

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< March 19 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 21 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 20

edit

04:17, 20 March 2025 review of submission by MJCeledon

edit

I am submitting a Wikipedia article on Fluid Mathematics System (FMS), a proposed mathematical framework that integrates classical, quantum, and computational mathematics. The article was declined due to concerns about sources and notability. Since FMS is a new framework, independent sources are limited. However, I have published research on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15038600) and Academia.edu. Please let me know what more I can do. Thank you for your time. MJCeledon (talk) 04:17, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MJCeledon, Wikipedia is the last place to publish something, by design, not the first place. If there are no independent sources discussing your proposal and providing details about your proposed framework, then, unfortunately, there can be no article. Papers on new theories are not in line with the purpose of Wikipedia, unless independent, reliable sources provide significant coverage of those new theories. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:10, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

08:37, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Repsjared

edit

Hello, Hope you are well. I drafted an article which got rejected but I have since edited the article and would like to please know if the article is suitable as it currently reads. Here's the article Draft:Aftershock PC Repsjared (talk) 08:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Repsjared The whole url is not needed when linking, I've fixed this for you. The draft was declined, not rejected. Rejected has a specific meaning in the draft process, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Declined means it may be resubmitted, and you have already done so; the reviewer will leave you feedback if not accepted.
The draft just summarizes the routine activities of the company and its offerings, this does not establish that the company meets our definition of a notable company. That requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources; see WP:ORGDEPTH. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for the response, and also for fixing the link. I will read through the links you provided on Wiki's notability definition and reliable sources. Thanks again for the help. Repsjared (talk) 09:19, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you work for this company, that must be disclosed, see WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't work for the company. I am editing the article in return for a product discount. Repsjared (talk) 09:22, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Repsjared Editing for a product discount means that you are a paid editor and that the Terms of Use require you to make the paid editing disclosure. Please see the instructions I will provide on your user talk page. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I see that you declared that. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I just declared that after a live chat support to get more clarity on what's missing in the article. Appreciate your help. Repsjared (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

08:41, 20 March 2025 review of submission by 2405:201:8029:F89C:2438:2BFC:879A:DFB6

edit

to get my article published. 2405:201:8029:F89C:2438:2BFC:879A:DFB6 (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What specific help are you seeking? 331dot (talk) 08:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

09:10, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Serhiparad

edit

Hello,

Could you please let me know, comments on why the page was rejected and what I should change to publish it? Serhiparad (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Serhiparad The draft was wholly promotional and has been deleted. Wikipedia is not a place for a company to tell about itself and its offerings. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Coverage must be in depth, beyond routine announcements, brief mentions, and the like, see WP:ORGDEPTH. Interviews and other materials from the company do not establish notability as they are not independent sources.
I see that you made the paid disclosure on your draft, you should do this on your user page, User:Serhiparad instead. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

10:53, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Sayed Al Mostafaa

edit

Why did my article drop ? Sayed Al Mostafaa (talk) 10:53, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sayed Al Mostafaa You have the word "asking" where the full title of your draft should go- I assume it is Draft:Ukhia Government Multilateral High School. The reason has been left by the reviewer. Do you have a more specific question about it? 331dot (talk) 10:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

11:16, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Rajendra Khairnar

edit

why My Submission declined,what is the Problems in my citation. Please guide me for. Rajendra Khairnar (talk) 11:16, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rajendra Khairnar You had your name where the link to your draft should go, I've fixed this.
Your draft consists of a movie poster and some headers, no prose about the film. An article must summarize what independent reliable sources choose to say about the topic. You must show that this is a notable film. Please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 11:30, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

12:05, 20 March 2025 review of submission by DaniKro

edit

Hello, I've made some modifications to the article and added more sources. Could you please help me understand what issues the article has now? Thanks! DaniKro (talk) 12:05, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DaniKro You need the "Draft:" portion of the title in the header for the link to work properly, I've fixed this for you.
The reviewer left you a message about what is needed for the draft. If you need more detail, I would suggest asking the reviewer directly on their user talk page. I also would note that it's likely unnecessary to state that the maker of the game releases updates; that's a normal thing with apps and games. 331dot (talk) 12:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

20:59, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Eltonatlarge

edit

I believe this is a worthy article about a scientific breakthrough and subsequent impact on public health. I've included multiple diverse and credible sources including major news outlets and published research in scientific peer-reviewed journals. What am I missing? Any help or suggestions are welcome. Thanks. Eltonatlarge (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Eltonatlarge Two independent reviewers did not share your belief. Please confirm that you have understood the specific resins for their declines, ask them in the first instance for things you feel need clarification, and return 'to this thread with further questions, unless it has been archived. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

21:57, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Srwinch

edit

I've tried to rewrite this in the most neutral tone possible, but I'm just nervous about resubmitting and I'm scared that my work will get deleted. Is someone able to look over my draft? Thank you so much in advance! Srwinch (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Srwinch Unfortunately you have generated this with a large language model. Pity. That;s like copying your schoolwork and expecting a grade. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't write the whole thing with a LLM, I only used it to help edit my submission to be more neutral. Srwinch (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
LLM's are terrible at this sort of thing. They do not make things more neutral and on the contrary, will tend to add WP:PEACOCK terms and other promotional language, and frequently make up facts and sources. Now it reads like an obvious AI creation, so unfortunately, your work has apparently already been deleted, just by the AI at your request. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:02, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

22:32, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Writefather

edit

Waiting for approval Writefather (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Writefather Thank you for your patience, which is a virtue. Please continue to improve the draft while you wait. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:38, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

23:06, 20 March 2025 review of submission by Reecelucas2003

edit

Can someone help make the page neater, less promotion like please. Reecelucas2003 (talk) 23:06, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It has been deleted as unambiguous promotion. 331dot (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2025_March_20&oldid=1282855886"