Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 March 24

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< March 23 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 24

edit

11:10, 24 March 2025 review of submission by Cyto2015

edit

Hope you can help. I have gone through the draft in detail and revised it significantly to meet WP:NCORP standards. Weak sources such as blogs, press releases, brief announcements, and company-authored materials have been removed. They are replaced by robust, reliable, independent, and in-depth third-party coverage from Technology Reseller, Intelligent CIO, The Business Magazine, and Investors in People, clearly demonstrating Payara Services' notability according to Wikipedia guidelines. Hope this is sufficient!

Any advice, I appreciate it Cyto2015 (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel you have addressed the concerns of reviewers, the first step is to appeal to the rejecting reviewer directly and ask them to reconsider. 331dot (talk) 12:51, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 331dot. I shall do that Cyto2015 (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

11:57, 24 March 2025 review of submission by Svenja Taubert

edit

I recently submitted a draft article titled “BodyFast Intermittent Fasting App” and received feedback that it was not accepted because it “reads more like an advertisement.” I appreciate the review, but I’m a bit unsure how to move forward.

Our current draft is intentionally concise and factual, focusing on the app’s history, services, and scientific background, with references to independent sources. We’ve avoided promotional language and tried to adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines for tone and neutrality.

Would it be possible to clarify:

Which parts of the draft come across as promotional? Are there specific sections or phrases we should revise or remove?

We are eager to make the necessary changes to meet Wikipedia’s standards and would be grateful for any concrete suggestions or examples of what would be considered an acceptable format for a digital health app like ours.

Thank you in advance for your time and guidance! Svenja Taubert (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You say "we" and "our", only a single person should have exclusive access to your account.
Your draft tells very little about the app itself. Any article about the app will need to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it, showing how it is notable. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

12:43, 24 March 2025 review of submission by Yogesh Mishraa

edit

Mr. Yogesh Mishra is a renowned journalist, educationist, litterateur and social reformist. He is deeply committed to providing constructive solutions to the challenges that the society and people in general face. He firmly believes in the vision of a "New India," one that can be achieved through innovative and inclusive approaches. His journey has led him to develop the concept of "AntyodayiSamajwad," a fusion of the ideals of the venerable PanditDeenDayalUpadhyay and the visionary socialist leader Dr. Ram ManoharLohia. Yogesh Mishraa (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yogesh Mishraa You need the "Draft:" portion of the title when linking. I've fixed this.
Your username is Yogesh Mishraa, but you are writing as if you aren't him. If you are not him, you need to change your username immediately via Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

18:12, 24 March 2025 review of submission by Sarier

edit

Hello. I've made an english draft for this item:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q978306

I've improved the content, but I don't know if it's enough to publish. Sarier (talk) 18:12, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you think you have addressed the concerns of the reviewer, you should resubmit the draft, that is the best way to get feedback. We don't do pre-review reviews here. 331dot (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, I'm not sure http://www.jdiezarnal.com/valenciabasilica.html counts as something other than a blog. (A very good blog, but still). I certainly think it likely to be notable (with the article existing in 8 other languages) so, I'd advise you to keep trying to find references. You certainly appear to understand they don't have to be in English.Naraht (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

19:38, 24 March 2025 review of submission by Bob1272

edit

Tell me why get denied? Bob1272 (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons have been left by the reviewer. Do you have specific questions about them? 331dot (talk) 19:47, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bob1272: Your sources are a website homepage and a Fandom/Wikia wiki, neither of which are usable sources. I've also restored the decline notice you removed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:48, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

19:48, 24 March 2025 review of submission by 24.51.233.169

edit

Don't delete this!!!! 24.51.233.169 (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then take this seriously. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:53, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

22:12, 24 March 2025 review of submission by Flyhigh223!

edit

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Based on my understanding, all the content provided is rooted in factual information and supported by reliable references. I would greatly appreciate your guidance on identifying any specific words or sentences that may not appear neutral or could be perceived as promotional.

Additionally, if there are any statements or sections that lack sufficient evidence or suitable references, kindly let me know. I am more than happy to make the necessary adjustments or remove any content that does not meet the required standards.

Thank you. Flyhigh223! (talk) 22:12, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flyhigh223! What is your connection to Mr. Bhattacharjee? You took a picture of him and he posed for you. 331dot (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for your reply. I downloaded the image from Fullwell Conservatives facebook page and it is on his Twitter/X. I was not aware that "own work" is not a suitable category and the image is in the public ___domain as it was used for election purposes. I will remove the image if this is required and I apologise for the confusion. Flyhigh223! (talk) 22:47, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Flyhigh223! That an image is public does not mean that it is in the public ___domain from a legal standpoint. Unless the copyright has been explicitly released for the image, you can't assume anything. If you are saying that the image was a publicity image for his campaign, you will need something from the campaign or him, such as a copyright notice on his website, to show that it's copyright is compatible with Wikipedia’s(allowing for reuse by anyone for any purpose with attribution). Even publicity images are not necessarily without copyright.
Either way, you cannot claim that you created the image and that you own the copyright to it as you currently are. My advice is that you just request deletion of the image from Commons. Images are not relevant to the draft process, which only considers the text and sources. Images can wait until the draft is accepted and placed in the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have attempted to request deletion of the file. Is there anything wrong with the actual body of the text/references? Flyhigh223! (talk) 16:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot? Flyhigh223! (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Despite appearances I'm not here all the time. He is not not notable as a politician as he has not held public office. His medal would make him a notable person, but more needs to be said of him than "he got a medal". There should be sources that discuss his work that led to his receiving the award. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2025_March_24&oldid=1283041482"