Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Brazil. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Brazil|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Brazil. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to South America.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Brazil

Ken Bellini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A collegiate soccer player with just three appearances for the reserve team of Real Salt Lake. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:TOOSOON appears relevant. Raskuly (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Brazil, North Carolina, and Utah. Raskuly (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Svartner (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:34, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, coverage passes GNG IMO.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:09, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. [1] seems fluffy, and there are no other signs of coverage or indications of notability. Geschichte (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paleorrota Geopark

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Nothing much found to suggest there is notability JMWt (talk) 09:59, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Brazil. JMWt (talk) 09:59, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul#Paleontology – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 15:05, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This book makes an encyclopedic claim and has some coverage on page 151. This source also makes an encyclopedic claim, although the coverage is scant: [2] If more sources can be found I would support keeping this. Otherwise the redirect proposed by Svartner seems reasonable.4meter4 (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of historical ships of the Brazilian Navy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Draftification because of no sourcing reverted without explanation; currently minimal sourcing verifies only a tiny part of the list. Suggest re-draftifying until the list adequately meets the core content policy WP:V. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:04, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Engineering, Transportation, Lists, and Brazil. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:04, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I created a separate page to 'List of historical ships of the Brazilian Navy' bcoz it helps to make the page more visible and readable, in current situation it is a section and gets suppressed under other major sections, where it has little to no sources provided to support. please note this section has been present since a long time but no sources were present, (it was just a section). creation of a separate page will allow for addition of more sources and provide better validity and visibility to a significant part of brazil navy chronology
Bonadart (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify per the "Incubation" section of our deletion policy. This article doesn't meet the requirements of WP:NLIST yet. Bonadart I really like what you've done so far and where you're going; I look forward to seeing this as a bona fide article. Before then each item in the list either needs a blue link (i.e., its own reliably sourced article) or it needs to cite a reliable reference. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadart, pt:Marinha do Brasil, the Portuguese Wikipedia article for the Brazilian Navy is very good and heavily referenced. It's a featured article and a potential source of refs. Google Translate can be your friend there. You might also contact the naval attache at the Brazilian embassy in your country - they might point you to some useful resources. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadart, I just found a list of historical ships on the Portuguese Wikipedia: pt:Lista de navios descomissionados da Marinha do Brasil. I hope this helps. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:08, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for all the help, but my point is i didnt create this page out of thin air, it was already there in list of active ships of brazilian navy, as a section but without any source for the past several years, no one ever bothered to add any source (dont believe me, you can chk the section is still here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Brazilian_Navy_ships). i created the separate page bcoz this is an important page that delves in list of ships of brazil navy since past 3 centuries, as such deserves a own space. whoever created this page in the first place, should have added source, anyways will try and look into the source you provided to help the page flourish. but kindly understand drafting it will literally orphan the section in the link provided. Bonadart (talk) 09:34, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil Proposed deletions

Funk automotivo (via WP:PROD on 10 May 2025)