Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Cyclones/Workshop

This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched To request an amendment or clarification of an arbitration decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. To report a violation of an arbitration decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks.

Main case page (talk) — Preliminary statements (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk)

Case clerks: Guerillero (talk) & GeneralNotability (talk) & Firefly (talk) Drafting arbitrators: Primefac (talk) & BDD (talk) & Cabayi (talk)

Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behaviour during a case may also be considered by the Committee in arriving at a final decision.

Summary of evidence from Arb Com

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to request that I be given until 00:00 UTC tonight to add additional items to my proposals here given the summary of evidence from Arb Com was posted yesterday. Noah^Talk 14:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The workshop phase doesn't close until the end of the day so it's still open for you @Hurricane Noah. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Barkeep49: Is there a specific policy which deals with coordinated editing? AFAIK it is separate from canvassing, meat puppetry, and vote stacking. Noah^Talk 16:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there is a policy/guideline about coordinated editing per se. Instead it exists at the intersection of the policies you named. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply