Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates/Primefac/Questions
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Just Step Sideways in topic wbm1058 question
wbm1058 question
edit@Wbm1058: I'm not a hundred percent sure what you are looking for but it looks like you are asking Prime to explain an ArbCom block. Such blocks, by definition, are based on private or supressed information and therefore the reasons cannot be discussed publicly. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- {{ArbComBlock}} says nothing about private or suppressed information, so I don't know where that "definition" comes from. For all I know, the block could have been based on a whim. I haven't looked to see whether anything was suppressed; you could save me some time by saying "yes or no" to "was something suppressed?" and which user posted the information that was suppressed. Or maybe it wasn't anything they did on Wikipedia, but rather something they did offsite or even offline. I have no idea. – wbm1058 (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- ArbCom only blocks people that need to be blocked by ArbCom. That's been the practice for quite some time. I don't know anything about this block at all, but even if I did I couldn't say. You could ask the committee by email, but I can pretty much guarantee you'll get basically the same answer. That they can't tell you is the reason it is an arbcom block, there's some sort of evidence that should only be reviewed by the committee. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)