Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tim Pool
Please contribute to the discussion on the project page
Forget it guys about posting the reason to save Tim Pool, if they do not have the sense to know better than this they have been bribe corrupted by the 1% its is over fuck WIKI....COMMON SENSE WOULD TELL YOU THIS IS WORTH SAVING... WIKI IS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR...
Should not delete Tim Pool. He is documenting history, someday we will look back at his work and be amazed at what we rose up from. It would be a shame to delete living history.
- Please sign your comments and contribute to the discussion on the project page. Thanks--(Wikipedian1234 (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC))
Should not delete Tim Pool, he has and is and will keep delivering the straight news to us on what has happened. He was there for all of us when CNN, FOX and all main news was doing a cover up. He was there for the beginning of it. It was history in the making on news by live stream. Did wiki get a large donations from corporations or lobbyist to even consider this? Thanks Charles Ed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearmascel (talk • contribs) 04:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Tim Pool is on a panel alongside Jesse Lagreca how is he any less notable than Jesse? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.7.97 (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not delete Tim Pool. He has been a fundamental journalist and film maker for the OWS movement. He has a huge following that relies on him for daily information. He is very needed, and we want him here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sannlorias (talk • contribs) 05:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I can only say that the 99%/occupy, we have no leader but the people and the only leader we have is TIM POOL for he is the one delivering the news to us. Is this not history in its making by itself. Let this protest rock on with Tim at the front line...You got to remember we have no budget we are not corrupted. To launch a protest like this with no leader but the people and TIM POOL at the stern for us to deliver all the news to us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearmascel (talk • contribs) 06:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
NO DELETION! Wikipedia, someone is messing with you and his page. Tim Pool is OUR historian. He is on the front line of history in the USA documenting our 2nd American Revolution. Painfully honestly and with the full support of all who watch him do this. He has a worldwide following. We come here, to Wikipedia for information on any number of subjects. Tim Pool is one of them. Right now he is under attack from any number of sources, he is mentioned in Time Magazines "2011 Person of the Year" online edition for goodness sake! How much more relevant can that be? W00dbeck (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am a highly experienced Wikipedian (6 years), not a lobbyist. I am questioning the notability of Tim Pool, which I have the freedom to do. All of you reveal bias in your absurd accusations and blatant praise of Mr. Pool. Again, if you would like to contribute to the debate please go to the main project page. Thanks--(Wikipedian1234 (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC))