Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/RPH
Latest comment: 19 years ago by 24.19.96.143
- I am not RPH, but you ARE Vandalising pages. You've traipsed over to at least a hundred pages so far, and without any prior word or attempts at explanation, slashed out the Spoiler tags. You have been asked very politely to stop REPEATEDLY, yet you continue your behavior. In every instance you have removed the tags, there have been major plot points (which is why the tag is there in the first place). You are being reverted as vandalism because that is WHAT IT IS, and you're damaging the project. 24.19.96.143 19:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you aren't this user, I apologize for my accusation and I'll try not to jump to conclusions again. My edits still aren't vandalism, however. Vandalsim in wikipedia is described as a bad faith attempt at reducing the quality of the encyclopedia. My edits are directly opposed to this description and are always made in good faith. Such false accusations are not the way a wikipeidian is permitted to act.
- Let's look at your contributions. On June 20, 2006 at 7:27, your first edit to mainspace is merely a thumb through articles I've previously editted with the sole intent to revert. Similar patterns on your previous IP's as well. This is unacceptable stalkery and counter-productive mainspace habbits. There is not one standalone article edit made in good faith or from a independent basis. If we also look at the first edit it was made to this subpage. Ethier this was accomplished from watching recent changes or wiki-stalking. Provided the contribtion histories from the previous IP's the former is very unlikely, as the timeframe and edit summeries clearly demonstrate. Its also noteworhty that User:RPH most recent contribution was construted on 19:04, June 20, 2006, meaning he's swithing between accounts or this is another "editor". Ethier way, its not important. The point of the situation is that its disruptive and describing edits by long-time contributors as vandalism isn't something that's tolerated. -ZeroTalk 00:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Again with the personal attacks! I use an IP that shifts at different varying points when I login to my internet service- so trying to "track" my "worth" by contributions doesn't work. Secondly- you ARE vandalising. You aren't making "good faith" contributions, you're only slashing out Spoiler tags from multiple articles, despite that fact that people have quite civilly tried to reason with you. You would do well to read the section in Wikipedia vandalism concerning Blanking, because that's what you're doing- YOUR VANDALISM WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. 24.19.96.143 01:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)