Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee/Poll
This is a poll of the suggested policy changes generated during the RfC process. This is not a formal vote on if these should be policy. This is to decide between some conflicting options that were generated during the process, and select them as our recommendations for policy changes.
The poll uses Approval voting. You may approve of multiple choices, including a choice to maintain current policy in that area. Commentary will be deleted from this page.
THIS POLL IS A DRAFT AND NOT YET ACTIVE
editNumber of members returned per election
editPolicy Change Option : Each election will appoint 7 members to the Arbitration Committee. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Policy Change Option : Make no change to policy on number or members returned per election. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Term of office, and frequency of election
editPolicy Change Option : The term of office for an Arbitration Committee Member is 18 months. Members are elected in three groups staggered over three elections six months apart. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Policy Change Option : The term of office for an Arbitration Committee Member is 12 months. Members are elected in three groups staggered over three elections four months apart. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Policy Change Option : The term of office for an Arbitration Committee Member is 24 months.Members are elected in four groups staggered over four elections six months apart. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Policy Change Option : Make no change to policy on term and frequency of elections. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Providing a grace period for evidence
editSuggested Policy : Except in exceptional circumstances, at least one week will be given for evidence preparation before any voting takes place, excluding temporary injunctions. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve
Policy Change Option : Make no change to policy on providing a grace period for evidence. |
- Sign with #--~~~~ to approve