Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Bishonen 3
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Unitanode in topic Closure recommendation
Closure recommendation
editIn my view, this RfC is sound and fury, signifying nothing, and should never have been opened. As I'm not an RfC/user regular, what are the procedures for getting a disruptive RfC like this one closed? UnitAnode 20:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't know we had an article on that soliloquy! Neither of us can close this, as we've both particiapated. You can create a section called "move to close" instead of "View by Unitanode" and place your statement there. It may or may not lead to early closure. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 20:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I can certainly see why some people would like this closed. However I still want to know why an administrator on Wikipedia knowingly allowed another administrator to use a sock puppet to support her point of view in a dispute. Surely this is a violation of trust. I don't think it is unreasonable to want this behavior examined by the community. Chillum 03:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think that your views regarding -- and antagonism towards -- Bishonen are explained quite well in your posted view. UnitAnode 04:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I can certainly see why some people would like this closed. However I still want to know why an administrator on Wikipedia knowingly allowed another administrator to use a sock puppet to support her point of view in a dispute. Surely this is a violation of trust. I don't think it is unreasonable to want this behavior examined by the community. Chillum 03:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you are talking about Unitanode. I think it is a bit inappropriate to discard the facts due to who says them anyways. It is not as though there is a lack of evidence, though you folks have done a fine job sweeping it under the rug. Chillum 12:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- You are, of course, free to have that view of the issue. It's not true, but you are free to believe whatever you like about me. UnitAnode 13:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you are talking about Unitanode. I think it is a bit inappropriate to discard the facts due to who says them anyways. It is not as though there is a lack of evidence, though you folks have done a fine job sweeping it under the rug. Chillum 12:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)