Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Robotics and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | WikiProject Robotics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 24 September 2012. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
edit Hello, |
Requested move at Talk:Robotics conventions#Requested move 30 August 2024
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Robotics conventions#Requested move 30 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Robert C. Michelson
editRobert C. Michelson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Serve Robotics AfC Draft Review
editHi there. I'm wondering if any editors at this WikiProject would be interested in reviewing my AfC draft for Serve Robotics. I was very careful to write in a neutral, encyclopedic style and only cite high-quality sources (e.g., TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Bloomberg, The Verge, and Quartz). The draft was immediately declined and I would appreciate a thoughtful assessment from editors familiar with the subject area (namely, robotics and technology), so that I'm updating the draft in the right way before trying again, as I don't want to keep hitting a brick wall and wasting editors' time.
To me, the "written like an advertisement" tag feels unwarranted and is something I really really tried to avoid... but maybe there's something I'm missing. I'd welcome feedback from others. I know I'm coming from a biased perspective as the comms head at Serve so I would appreciate help in creating a neutral article that's a contribution to the Wikipedia community. Thank you! ServeAduke (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Meta Platforms#Requested move 29 October 2024
edit There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Meta Platforms#Requested move 29 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 21:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
There is an RFC at Talk:15.ai#RFC_on_Status_of_Web_Site on the status of the web site. Participation is invited. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Suggested Major Revision of Optical Flow
editHi there!
I've suggested significant changes to the Optical Flow article. See Talk:Optical flow for further details. The changes suggested are in my User:Moderately Sized Greg/sandbox. I'm fairly new, so any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Moderately Sized Greg (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Request for review of Alexander Meystel draft
editHello,
I am the son of Alexander M. Meystel, who was a researcher and professor known for his work in intelligent control systems, robotics, and machine intelligence. I have recently created a draft Wikipedia article to honor his scientific contributions, including numerous IEEE publications, patents, and leadership roles.
Given his important role in the development of multiresolutional control theory and autonomous robotics, I would appreciate if members of WikiProject Robotics, Control Theory, or Electrical Engineering could kindly review the draft.
My goal is to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards, maintains a neutral tone, and accurately reflects his impact in the field.
The draft can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alexander_Meystel
Thank you very much for your time and expertise!
Best regards, Michael Meystel Meystel (talk) 19:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
edit| Hello, |
Good article reassessment for Nikola Tesla
editNikola Tesla has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
The article Megasaurus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged as Unreferenced for 12+ years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. No assertion nor evidence of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)