Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 ATP World Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2018 ATP World Tour

2018 ATP World Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We just started the 2016 season and now we have someone creating the 2018 season (and 2017 season). Way too early for this. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 ATP World Tour. A separate AfD for 2018 does not seem practical. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep, as there is very little point having two separate discussions on two articles that are identical apart from the future year. If the other article is kept, this one will be kept, too. If the other article is deleted, this one will be, too. Use Template:Afd footer (multiple) for future cases where multiple related articles are put up for deletion. Oh, and there is no point deleting either of these, as they are clearly notable. Schwede66 02:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually I had thought about that and felt there was a huge difference between having an article that was 1 year in the future vs an article that was 2 years in the future. If the other is kept it has no bearing on this one. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.