Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjusted Goals Against Average
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Adjusted Goals Against Average (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day -- author, who cites himself as the inventor of this statistic in the original version of this article, states on the talk page: "This is a new statistic but something I consider possibly revolutionary. It expands on a commonly accepted measurement (Goals against Average), resulting in a more accurate measure of the goalie's true ability. Please let me know any opinions on it. Alex Irwin" Nat Gertler (talk) 00:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wow, WP:OR, WP:COI and WP:MADEUP all in one. Failed to find reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Appears to be madeup, I found a source that discusses "Adjusted Goals Against Average" but it is a different concept than this. I found nothing outside of this article about this average. ~~ GB fan ~~ 06:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as author openly admits that it is original research. Cullen328 (talk) 07:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, yep pure original research. Yoenit (talk) 08:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete They've said it all above.... Peridon (talk) 09:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't fall into any speedy-deletion category, or it would have gone already.--Michig (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:OR, no reliable sources. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Original Research. There's nothing wrong with advanced sports statistics, it's just that WP isn't the place to first publish them. —Carrite, Oct. 10, 2010.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.