Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agassi–Chang rivalry (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Agassi–Chang rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is only a repository of results and unsourced. Same as an earlier AfD for Agassi-Rafter rivalry [1]. Agassi and Chang never met in a Grand Slam final, and Chang was a one-slam winner who was never ranked nr1. By this standard we could get a lot of head-to-head results pages on WP. According the WP:NSPORTS rivalries are not inherently notable. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above, I see no evidence that there was really a notable 'rivalry' of any kind. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of media coverage and thus third party sources (lack of any references so to say). Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 07:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: as per users Nwlaw63 and Lajbi; also subjective and of questionable notability. Quis separabit? 19:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.