Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksei Vorobyev
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (NAC) --Jmundo (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Aleksei Vorobyev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nominated for speedy but hasnt been speedied for 5-6 hours, Its not sure it qualifies for speedy either but it qualifies to Afd because there is no notability or the notability is not included in the page. The Rolling Camel (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This article was given less than one minute after creation before being tagged with speedy deletion. If User:Ndenison want to keep new users away from Wikipedia, he is doing a fine job. Vodello (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Barnstar to that one that can expand and find the notability of this article. I know its notable but i can't read russian and i don't have time to fix it myself i someway.
- Since you know it's notable, then there is absolutely no excuse for your AFD nomination. There is no deadline. Motion for Speedy Close per nom's comments above. Vodello (talk) 04:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, i forgot to write that. Of cource its a nomination withdrawl. The Rolling Camel (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Not giving time for an article to be developed is absolutely pathetic. Heaven forbid if that the person who started the stub planned on working on it, only to see less than 60 seconds later it has been put up for speedy deletion. A search would indicate some degree of notability, along with interviews, etc. --Russavia Dialogue 10:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.