Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alibi perfetto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per emerging consensus and edits to the article during the discussion Star Mississippi 17:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alibi perfetto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Couldn't find any good sources through a google search. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 13:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating additional pages for deletion:

– AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 13:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both are movies of a notable Italian filmmaker. Why the should be eliminated? Gianluigi02

Keep Films are unrelated other than director and should be discussed individually on their own merits and not lumped together in one deletion discussion. Found reviews at [1] for one of the films, and a review at [2] for one of the other ones. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article for the director has a list of his films. Since none of the articles are more than a bare plot summary with no citations it seems best to keep all of the info together on the page for the director (which itself is barely bare-bones). I looked at the articles in Italian WP and they, too, lacked significant references. Lamona (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 13:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all to the director's page. Can't find enough to see that they pass GNG or NFILM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Italian version of the page lists a legitimate and reliable book reference, which itself extensively cites a long contemporary review of the film from Il Messaggero. Also Inland, a journal of cinema studies published by renowed publisher Edizioni Bietti, in occasion of a monographic issue dedicated to Lado published an accurate and long review of the film (the article is available here). I have edited the page accordingly. Cavarrone 13:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: good and reliable sources. I added some sources also to the other two films (Venerdì nero and Rito d'amore).--Alienautic (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. After the addition of sources, it appears to meet notability. Ifnord (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.