Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applied Information Technology in Chalmers University of Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 15:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applied Information Technology in Chalmers University of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article looks like an advertisement, which is a violaton of WP:NOTADVERTISING. Not in neutral point of view. Notability is also a concern (educational courses or degrees are not eligible for an article on Wikipedia just because the university or educational institution is notable, the course/degree itself has to be notable and covered by reliable and independent sources). Article consists of 2 references, both are from the university's official website. jfd34 (talk) 09:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agreed that it reads like an ad. However, it seems to be part of a University program. I see above that this does not make it notable...what does? It can be given a neutral tone if there is sufficient notability. Stormbay (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reads like a university prospectus. No evidence that the program itself is notable and deserving of a self-standing article. --DAJF (talk) 04:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on the basis of its association with the [University of Gothenburg] and the notability of the parent organizatin, the Chalmers University of Technology. It does need a serious rewrite. If no one steps up on that front, a redirect to Chalmers University of Technology would be a logical solution. Stormbay (talk) 22:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of parent is not a valid argument as notability is not inherited. Ipsign (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Consensus has been that it takes very strong evidence to justify a separate article on an individual program in a university. What's basically the standard is world-wide fame.This isn't even a doctoral program, and is therefore nowhere at all near that level. It should get a mention but a mention only in the article on the university but nothing further, so there isn't really anything to merge. and it isn't a useful redirect, nobody would look for it independently of the university. DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fatally failing WP:GNG. Ipsign (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.